Is there any info on what this distro is supposed to be? Browsed the site could not find any summary of what makes it different
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
55 points (98.2% liked)
Linux
47361 readers
1734 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
It's an immutable distro akin to Fedora Silverblue, which means it's theoretically extremely solid but you can't easily change the base system.
And while I haven't tried it myself, the thing that seems to set VanillaOS apart from something like Silverblue is that is built around the idea of containing various subsystems based on other distros (like an Ubuntu subsystem and an Arch subsystem), which should make it easy to install packages from a variety of distro (or even the AUR, for another example) on top of a very solid, static base system. Under the hood it uses a container management tool called Distrobox to achieve that, but it seems to be pretty nicely abstracted for user simplicity.
I daily drive Fedora Silverblue and I do something similar with distrobox for things that don't make sense to install as Flatpaks. In other words, on my system I have an immutable base system (with optional package layering, rollbacks, rebasing, etc.), then flatpaks or appimages for most simple applications (firefox, blender, krita, etc.), and finally distrobox to handle various dev environments and music production environment (which relies on wine and a lot of plugins).
VanillaOS is something like that, but out of the box, and aiming to be GUI-user friendly.
This has some good info.
https://news.itsfoss.com/vanilla-os-beta/
The main change with 2.0 is the Debian Sid base, as opposed to Ubuntu.
Debian Sid? Why not Bookworm?
The devs laid out their reasoning here:
https://vanillaos.org/blog/article/2023-03-07/vanilla-os-20-orchid---initial-work
Essentially, they want a non-opinionated rolling release and to stick with apt as a base package manager, which means that Sid is the obvious solution.
Thanks for the explanation. I just didn't get the apt-part, since Bookworm uses apt too.
It’s an immutable disto built around distrobox, I believe
I played around with it in a VM earlier today. I liked the overall feel of it quite a bit, even as someone who prefers not to use gnome. But there are quite a few inconsistencies in using the alpha compared to what’s in the handbook, particularly for installing new packages. I wonder if that’s something that’s still being implemented in Orchid.
I liked it though, I’ll definitely keep following it.
The latest developer preview build in an early alpha of 2.0. It is noticeably less functional than the latest stable release, which is still built on Ubuntu.
If you want to play around with their package manager and distrobox, I'd suggest trying out the latter.
I tried it for a while, not for normal use really. Everything is sandboxed and slow as fuck.
I’ve been daily driving for over a year and can say otherwise
I was using the Ubuntu based version, and the alternate package managers were slow on my low end system.