this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5194 readers
990 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
41
Britain’s climate action plan unlawful, high court rules (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 6 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tlf@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Happy to hear that courts start calling these ruses out for what they are

[–] MinFapper@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because it's not effective? Or too effective? Haven't read the article, but I'm guessing the former.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 months ago

Because it only contains "credible policies in place for less than 20% of the emissions cuts needed". The other 80% is all wishful thinking.