this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
64 points (92.1% liked)

linuxmemes

20986 readers
2029 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    Instead of delivering a nice funny image, just scroll through this issue.

    top 12 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] ThermoToaster@exng.meme 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)
    [–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 13 points 5 months ago

    Absolutely. This is so hillarious.

    How can you develop a Git forge and not host it on itself?

    Whyy? Also how they locked the issue and always changed the goals on version further... and that was 7!!! Years ago!

    [–] SpeakinTelnet@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    It doesn't make sense, Forgejo just forked gitea and discarded all of the history (I.e.: issues and PR) previously included in gitea's github repository. Of course they could host it on their own platform, it was already functional and they could start from a blank state.

    [–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago

    TLDR: "lets make github. Wait, we can't afford that"

    [–] Album@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    It doesn't really surprise me that a self hosted project cant afford to self host it's own self or be able to find a neutral hosting location.

    [–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

    I dont know how much it costs to host such a server, 10€ per month?

    I mean if you dont even use your software for real work i.e. a big project, how do you test it?

    [–] Album@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago

    The irony isn't lost on me but the comments show it wasn't that simple. If it was they surely would have done it.

    [–] Korbs@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    At least Forgojo is hosted on Codeberg. Actually I believe that Forgejo is a Codeberg project.

    [–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Yes, Gitea is a fork of Gog, and Forgejo is a fork of Gitea.

    Gitea messed up their finance stuff, has a for profit company and did a lot of shady swaps without transparency.

    Forgejo is sponsored by the nonprofit Codeberg [something] and is hosted on Codeberg.

    [–] Korbs@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

    Ah yes that's it. Forgejo has been great on my server.

    [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

    They are not the only ones. I've seen a few other alternative forges that haven't bothered dogfooding. It immediately lowers the trust in them. Does their shit really work if they have to host it on github?

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    [–] PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Wow that's a really long time. 7! works out to 5040 but 7!! is a stupidly huge number.