this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
215 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

31998 readers
1234 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link: https://archive.ph/GJauG

In exchange for selling them repair parts, Samsung requires independent repair shops to give Samsung the name, contact information, phone identifier, and customer complaint details of everyone who gets their phone repaired at these shops, according to a contract obtained by 404 Media. Stunningly, it also requires these nominally independent shops to “immediately disassemble” any phones that customers have brought them that have been previously repaired with aftermarket or third-party parts and to “immediately notify” Samsung that the customer has used third-party parts.

Aaron Perzanowski, a personal property law expert and professor at the University of Michigan Law School, told me “Most consumers would be very surprised to learn that their personal information and details about their devices are being shared with the manufacturer. And I doubt there is any meaningful disclosure of or consent to sharing that data. So this looks like a substantial and unexpected invasion of consumer privacy.”

“This is exactly the kind of onerous, one-sided ‘agreement’ that necessitates the right-to-repair,” Kit Walsh, a staff attorney at the Electronic Freedom Foundation and right to repair expert told me. “The data collection is excessive. I may not have chosen to disclose my address or identity to Samsung, yet an added cost of repair—even at an independent shop—is giving that information up. In addition to the provision you mentioned about dismantling devices with third-party components, these create additional disincentives to getting devices repaired, which can harm both device security and the environment as repairable devices wind up in landfills.”

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

Good supplemental reading here to iFixIt's recent announcement pertaining to their relationship with Samsung moving forward.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm posting from a note9. The last samsung device I'll ever own.

[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

Note 10+ here and same, as soon as I can afford one of those linux phones, or at least a second-hand pixel.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 3 points 5 months ago

Cool attitude! Please spread this! :)

[–] johny_joe_1975@discuss.online 5 points 5 months ago

Well, i wonder if anyone who sign this contract have brain.

[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Wannabe crapple being wannabe crapple.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

That's fine. No one said the contact information needed to be accurate