Shirts That Go Hard

3520 readers

10 users here now

Share shirts that go hard.

Example A, B, C1 C2

Community Rules

No racism, xenophobia, sexualism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

submitted 5 months ago by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/shirtsthatgohard@lemmy.world

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Parity branding ok?

The removal could be done by cropping it out. And perhaps if the branding is more so inside the image, it should be covered up.

What does the community think?

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] viking@infosec.pub 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I prefer to see the branding in case I want to buy one myself. Unless it's a blatant ad, I never really felt annoyed by a visible brand or logo.

[–] bigboismith@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I don't consider this a problem (yet). I don't think it should be banned until it becomes a problem here.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

What about branding that is the target of the "going hard"?

Say an anti-cigarette-company image, that, oh, e.g. identifies the average-life-span of the "Marlboro Man" models who smoked Marlboros??

Differentiate based on how it is being implimented in the image, not on the fact that it exists.

Disallowing brand-images would disallow criticism of those brands from appearing here, wouldn't it?

Beware of clumsy law!

( :