this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
49 points (88.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9645 readers
267 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The train tracks being down the middle of the highway makes a lot of sense, you are keeping the noise away from housing and it's an effective use of space since nothing else really works there, plus you already have the right of way.

Might make sense for the station to be off to whichever side has more people, and the tracks to go under the highway briefly but I bet that adds a bunch of cost.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Sure but the opportunity cost of not paying extra to place your train tracks well? No one rides it. The health cost of allcof this noise pollution on riders encourages them to find other transportstion options. No destination at the end. You get off the train and there's no development because it's surrounded by loud, ugly highway.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They do kind of suck. But from a city planner perspective you already have the right of way for all that road. Makes sense to put the transit station in the middle of the right of way.

Maybe add airport style moving walkways for the highway transit centers to increase the catchment area. Imagine if you could go 500 m on a moving walkway from transit stop away from the highway into the urban area

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They also don't have to entirely be terrible places to be.

Just look at Amsterdam-Zuid Station as an example of how to make such a highway median station bearable.
Though it is worth noting that Amsterdam-Zuid will be redeveloped in the coming years to move the highways underground

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago

Elevated parkland above the highways seems very nice. Just expensive

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why stop there? Why not build a hospital suspended in the most human-hostile area of land in the entire fucking city? A library? A day care? All that wasted land!

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 1 year ago

Name checks out

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm really glad for this video, because I actually thought these were a good idea. Lmao.

Wow this community is sleepy compared to the same one on lemmy.ml 🙄