this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
19 points (77.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8576 readers
389 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago

No it won’t. First steamOS is just very good on a handheld where windows isn’t, and even if it is such a good chip, valve could always adopt it in their next iteration.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 22 points 5 months ago

the problem that intel has that the piece doesnt mention is all of intels claims for the most part was intel comparing it against themselves and not their competitors, as intel probably knows that it would look silly vs AMD.

theres clearly stuff being hidden as Intels claiming both gpu performance and power consumption better than previous generation. the problem is, intel previous generation was already by default worse than AMD/TSMC in both fronts, so being better than previous intel only paints part of the picture.

also advertising for raytracing at this performance tier is silly. thats like trying to buy a rtx 3050 for raytracing (you really shouldn't)

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Comparing hardware is for fools. It assumes a static codebase. Steam is actively developed. The only hardware worth purchasing is that which is supported by the developers directly.

[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago

The only hardware worth purchasing is that which is supported by the developers directly

My thoughts exactly.

For a consistent and complete user experience that isn't completely driven by ulterior motives, this is usually the best way to go IMO

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago

Steam Deck is over 2 years old now and still works great. If Valve wanted to release a new version I'm sure it would compare favorably to this new chip.

[–] taanegl@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago

...what if the next Steam deck runs Intel?