this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
108 points (97.4% liked)

Privacy

31981 readers
374 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 81 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Don't worry, they'll kill the project after naming it Chrome Recall, Google Recall, Google Watcher, GWatch (with chat), Chat&Watch, Google Watch (new) in the span of a year.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 26 points 5 months ago

They will have 7 identical services but 6 will not support feature X

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nah, they'll kill it after a year due to hard drive costs. Enough screenshots at a resolution high enough to know wtf you're looking at and still have vaguely usable data would be absurd.

I could see it rebranded for enterprise usage for businesses and schools though, at an extra cost.

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Windows: does something privacy invading bad

Google: why didn't I think of that? Hold my beer

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 30 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I didn't think Linux was going to the the big thing but right now it is "winning" in the sense that it sucks the least.

[–] macattack@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm going to continue buying Chromebooks because I can wipe the OS and put Linux on them.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 8 points 5 months ago

GrapheneOS logic lol

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

yep, easily the best netbooks are chromebooks without chrome.

i wish we’d see another pixelbook tho. my battery poofed and nothing on the market comes close.

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Why the project have an Elon Musk xitter in the readme?

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 17 points 5 months ago

The fact Linux folk prefer to count their market share at 2% rather than be associated with Chrome OS should tell you how far it went off track.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 months ago

It is Linux but it really isn't Linux. It violates pretty much every philosophy of Linux

[–] Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I still don't understand who the fuck asked for such a feature.

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 months ago

It was the advertisers and government.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago
[–] SoulKaribou@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago

It's for your safety. Nothing will be collected without your consent. Obedience is freedom. Marry and reproduce.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago

It was trendy

[–] Midnight1938@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago

People were encrypting too many things. Gotta give something to the hard working feds

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I got as far as the second paragraph, which consists of the following quote from a Google VP:

“I’m not going to talk about Recall, but I think the reason that some people feel it’s creepy is when it doesn’t feel useful, and it doesn’t feel like something they initiated or that they get a clear benefit from it”

That's somehow worse than I imagined. I can at least understand being intentionally sinister, or overtly anti-privacy, but that level of delusion is somehow actually more terrifying.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 8 points 5 months ago

This is the company that couldn't understand why Google Glass failed so hard.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I can imagine those guys arguing about "legitimate interests" because data that isn't monetised is worthless or something.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 5 months ago

I know we're all thinking it, but people paying attention feel that way because... it’s creepy, it's not useful, it's not something they initiated, and they don't get a clear benefit from it.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 11 points 5 months ago

but I think the reason that some people feel it’s creepy is when it doesn’t feel useful, and it doesn’t feel like something they initiated or that they get a clear benefit from it”

Well, why do it then?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

lol but MS just recalled Recall

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No they just turned if off by default. They can change that will an update

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I know but that isn’t a snappy one-liner

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago

Yes it is

They can change your settings anytime.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 8 points 5 months ago

Can you like, not?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Both users are angry.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 7 points 5 months ago

WTF Google, did you really feel that gemini was such a threat that you had to usurp its name?