127
Corporate takeover of Supreme Court: all but one justice vote in favor of Starbucks
(www.dailykos.com)
When you remove peaceful options...
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
127 points (97.0% liked)
unions
1655 readers
119 users here now
a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc
Friends:
- https://lemmy.ml/c/labor
- https://sh.itjust.works/c/unions
- https://lemmy.ml/c/coops
- https://lemmy.ml/c/antitrust
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
...It's important to also saturate your for profit media machines with orwellian capitalist propaganda to make the poors blame eachother and only look upwards at their owners in reverence, gratitude, false hope and worship.
The NLRA was a response to militant labor organizing. While it seems like a capitulation at first, in reality it was a coups for ruling class interests and the bosses. Under the new regime, organized labor became much more legalized, entirely under the control of the anti-labor government, and could be robbed of its more radical elements that pushed for escalatory direct action, sympathy strikes, and wider coordination. The NLRA emphasized the worst aspects of trade unionism while weakening the best.
So basically, yeah. And here's hoping to its delegitimization.
Corrupt court. They should all be disbarred.
Sorry, best I can do is decades of bribes and sympathizing with traitors.
*SUISPRIWOURT COURT, actually
Calm down, gang. Even Jackson agreed with the judgment, if not all of the reasoning. Corrupt Court, sure, but this one they probably got right. I hate Starbucks too, and I wish the NLRB the sharpest teeth in the world, but preliminary injunctive relief should be extraordinary.
Can you eli5?
What in the hell is this cursed bot image?
Jackson was a concurrence, not a dissent, meaning it was 9-0 in reality.
(unless this is a different Starbucks ruling that I haven't seen yet)
I miss Sobe Energy. That was my favorite drink but if they even still make it, it's no longer sold in IL.