this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
21 points (95.7% liked)

Rust

5953 readers
10 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've needed to detect a frequency of an audio signal a couple of times in my life, but I cannot for the love of me remember what does the FFT output actually mean. So I took this knowledge out of my latest project and packed it up in this crate.

Also this is my first potentially useful published crate, so if I missed anything, please let me know!

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BB_C@programming.dev 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)
    /// # Panics
    ///
    /// - if `samples.len()` does not match the `sample_count` passed to [Self::new]
    /// - if there are `NaN`s in the sample slice

Since this is library code, why not make the function return a Result?

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yup, libraries should usually let the consumer chose what to do with an error, not crash the program without a choice in the matter. The only real exception is performance critical low level code such as the core of a graphics or audio driver. Though in those cases crashing also often isn't an option, you just power through and hope things aren't too screwed up.

[–] fil@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Thanks for the tip! Updated

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The new version seems to fix that since your comment was written, but it will stil panics if less than 2 samples are provided, unless the crate it wraps panics at an earlier point.

let peak = buf
            .iter()
            .copied()
            .enumerate()
            .take(self.sample_count / 2)
            .max_by_key(|(_, s)| (s.abs() * 1000.0) as u32)
            .expect("to have at least 1 sample");
[–] BB_C@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You should have mentioned OP.

@fil

[–] fil@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Excellent catch! Added validation for the new params