Technology

59219 readers

3235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

151

Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire After PR Firm's Scheme to Pay Critics for Positive Reviews Uncovered (www.ign.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire After PR Firm's Scheme to Pay Critics for Positive Reviews Uncovered::A new report details how a PR firm paid off critics to post positive reviews of 2018 drama Ophelia on Rotten Tomatoes, prompting scrutiny over the reviews aggregator.

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The title makes it sound like Rotten Tomatoes deliberately did something shady. What actually seems to have happened is:

Rotten Tomatoes aggregates critic reviews. As far as I know, those critics aren't really affiliated with Rotten Tomatoes.
Some of the critics that make up that aggregated rating got bribed to increase their evaluation of the movie.
Consequently the score on sites that aggregate reviews like Rotten Tomatoes increased.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The corruption of useful information or indexes of useful information continues.

Google Search, aggregated reviews, the Youtube algorithm, etc. They all succumb to corruption, greed and exploitation. Once something is good and useful, it becomes a target.

How does a source of aggregated information overcome becoming a target of corruption?

[–] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you. Another post worded it to be RT did this.

[–] gnygnygny@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Grab $
Manipulate critics
Caviar taste better than tomatoes

[–] Fantomas@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean this was so obvious. Pay for positive critic reviews and call any user reviews that weren't favourable names.

[–] Zrybew@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bad Boys For Life on 90 score convinced me the site was a fraud. That Shit is unwatchable.

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been using IMDB for the past year or so. Anyone know if they pay for reviews too?

[+] V4ty6BybVXjr@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

I think if the site is popular enough it will be a target for shills.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does something like, say, Wikipedia avoid this issue? Is it because Wikipedia focuses on factuality whereas critic reviews are inherently qualitative/subjective?

[–] Ascyron@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, Wikipedia doesn't avoid this. People constantly game the rules to remove or change content that doesn't suit them. I recall an instance where employees of a company were busted editing that company's page, they were caught because there were so many different editors all from the same corporate IP. And that's just the low hanging fruit that makes the news - I would wager there's 10 instances that never get noticed for each one that people spot.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't see why they can't add that to its page. Document the corporate ips as part of a section on attempts to self-editorialize their wiki articles.

Edit: add them to a Wikiverse-wide digital wall of shame to immortalize their deceptive efforts

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Rotten Tomatoes will also stop all new reviews if a movie is bombing. They definitely manipulate their ratings.

Edit Two Rotten Tomatoes employees downvoted this comment.