If I understand it right,
- the time-lock is from the time the recipient (Carol) starts decrypting the encrypted file sent by Bob.
- future microchips, according to Moore's Law, will decrypt the file much faster.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
31 points (94.3% liked)
Privacy
31872 readers
335 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
You don't even need a faster computer, you can just use more computers
The second premise is very dependent on the algorithm and the hardware itself. "Faster" can be very different when parallelization comes into play. Baring that, ASIC's also a thing. Also, Moore's law has not been very relevant since around 2020? The new Moore's law is power efficiency and not transistor density. Say for example, we've peaked at 5GHz on a single core performance with x86 ISA. Then the next step is how to reduce the power consumption for the same 5GHz.
Now, the readme mentioned about using Argon2id. A cpu-memory-hard function. So you are also limited by the theoretical maximum memory that you could allocate to crack the puzzle faster.