this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
343 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
4177 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 69 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Having read the title, I think I might be having a stroke... Or really need the iced latte this morning...

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope ... still makes no sense

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think monkeys are scamming people by stealing sim cards and activating them with fake IDs. It seems the monkeys are able to get away with this because the IDs appear genuine thanks to the photo. This also falls within a legal loophole as monkeys are generally not subject to law and often fail to appear for their court date anyway so law enforcement isn't able to effectively combat the issue.

After the crackdown on monkeys stealing from tourists and getting smashed on drinks left on the beach, they've had to improvise to survive.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] brianorca@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They added face recognition to the SIM registration process, in an attempt to reduce fraud. (Maybe by limiting or not allowing duplicate faces.) But a monkey face works too, and they are plentiful on the islands, supplying many unique faces.

[–] philodendron@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

I hope we get to see two people use the same monkey

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you! Finally makes sense.

[–] xia@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Have you seen doctor who, where an image of a weeping angel can become a weeping angel?

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I bet they're just scanning the barcode.. image recognition is way more expensive.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guess is it's not really trying to identify the person on the pic, just looking for anything looking like a human face, like any phone camera software would.

With the same pareidolia/non-human faces problems you'd get on those.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My guess is it's the Philippines. The corporations and gov especially has absolutely no idea how to computer. They add inefficient manual processes to modern tech that is completely automated in all instances.

It'd be hilarious if it weren't so infuriating. Filipinos deserve better, but it's a viscous cycle of supporting the most obvious sociopath, that leads to the next sociopath; ad infinitum.

[–] dublet@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In very mild defence of their government, it's not like many other countries do IT better at the national level.

[–] takingbacksunday@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'm from this hellhole country. This gov't screws over the people over every chance it gets. It deserves no defending.

[–] theterrasque@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, this is one place where they should have a manual process

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Solution to phone scams has nothing to do with sim card issuance. Any restrictions in that regard will only harm legitimate users.

We have to demand companies to strictly verify the incoming caller numbers, like we do with modern day emails. That way, filtering on the receiving side becomes possible.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I often wonder if spam protection would be better if more clearly displayed.

I know DKIM, SPF, DMARC aren't "friendly names" but we could call them "Sender Valid", "Email Valid", "Handshake Accepted" or something and then maybe a "no outside links" and "no suspicious content" — 5 pip marks or green ticks to feel better about it?

Then you could also force-display the domain and page title following links, and warn against mismatching reply-to: addresses. Maybe even show some known technographics from the headers ("Sent via Marketo?")

All that to say, systems like that would help against spam callers and scammers.

[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is number spoofing really a problem outside of North America (+1 country code)? Over the past decade or so I've had phone numbers in 5 different countries across several continents and never had any issues with number spoofing or really any spam from phone numbers at all (since a year ago, I get at most 1 spam SMS a month here in Japan, not one call ever), but I keep hearing only Americans talking about it as a problem.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think it's more widespread in the US but have definitely gotten it in central Europe

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really depends on how liberal you are with your phone number. Do you give it to everyone and anyone? Because once it’s on a spam call list, it stays there for a long while. Even after it’s “tested bad” it gets circulated through to other spammers.

Eventually it will fall off, but it takes years in some cases. And you need to be pretty vigilant with your screening to get there.

[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always assumed they just called every single number randomly. Since you don't pay for failed calls, the cost is zero.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some likely do, but there are other types of responses they will get that do cost. Such as answering services, fax machines, and even dialup endpoints. It’ll always be more cost effective to use a shared list of “good” numbers.

[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Good point!

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I got less than 2 outright scam calls in EU for as long as I have a phone. But if I use a foreign service that allows me to set an arbitrary caller ID, it will get through to my phone no problem.

I have no idea where the filtering happens, but if it fails one day, we're in for a lot of hurt. Oftentimes even the legitimate companies, like banks, will call you, and demand personal information from you "for verification purposes". Then, tries to sell you a loan, or an insurance. They always act surprised I'm not keen on sharing my personal info with a stranger.

[–] shotgun_crab@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I thought this was the onion for a second...