Leftism

2113 readers

2 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Absolutely no fascism, right wing extremism, genocide denial, etc.
Unconditional support of authoritarians will not be tolerated
Good faith discussion about ideologies is encouraged, but no sectarianism
No brocialism/sexism
No ableism
No TERFs/ anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric
No racism
No trolling
No insults, dunking, or personal attacks
No posting of misinformation, disinformation, or fake news
Mods have final say

Posting Expectations:

Comics/memes/shitposts/propaganda are only allowed on weekends
Try to avoid liberalism unless discussing electoral politics. Even then, try to focus on tactical agreement towards leftist goals
Only one meta post seeking consensus per person per day
Posts about a particular ideology are ok, but remember the rules above
Remember that there is no “right way” to implement leftist theory. This rule does not prevent academic criticism.
Try to avoid extremely sensitive topics unless approaching them with appropriate care for intersectionality. Use your best judgement, and be prepared to provide respectable sources when having these discussions. Wikipedia is not an acceptable source in these cases.
Post titles must be meaningful and relevant, except on weekends

Sister Communities:

!abolition@slrpnk.net !antiwork@lemmy.world !antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world !breadtube@lemmy.world !climate@slrpnk.net !fuckcars@lemmy.world !iwwunion@lemmy.ml !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com !leftymusic@lemmy.world !privacy@lemmy.world !socialistra@midwest.social !solarpunk@slrpnk.net Solarpunk memes !therightcantmeme@midwest.social !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world !vuvuzelaiphone@lemmy.world !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world !workreform@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Zstom6IP@lemmy.world

rockSlayer@lemmy.world

Why killing Trump is (probably) bad - Some thoughts on the morality and utility of political violence (ragdollx.substack.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world to c/leftism@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Although it may be justifiable from a moral perspective, a Trump assassination would likely lead to the Republican problem becoming even worse as we've seen a slight bump in the polls after the attempted assassination, and the other Republicans candidates as just as if not even more of a threat than him.

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The short version of the argument being made is basically this; if you think killing fascists will solve fascism, you're going to need a LOT of bullets to get the job done.

Trump is not the problem, he is the symptom. He's the GOP with the mask off. The toxicity he represents will not go away with his eventual death, whenever and however that comes.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 4 points 3 months ago

Basically, you can kill people, not ideas

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Also fascists like feeling like victims and REALLY like violence in response to perceived oppression. Murdering them will just embolden their behavior and they're certainly more depraved and craven than we are

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

See, that part I don't agree with. Fascists, for the most part, are cowards, and violence can, in the right circumstances, be a very effective tool in a broader strategy of denying them any form of platform or admission to public spaces. It is both effective, and a moral good, to punch fascists.

[–] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

To be fair, the right wing of American politics is the one with more guns. Killing the man they love most is begging for trouble.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"probably"

This is where we are as humanity.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do you think his assassination would be morally in addition to strategically wrong?

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes!

Morally, I don't believe in killing humans at all, especially summarily and without due process.
Self defense being an obvious exception.

Which would make a strategic purpose moot. However, strategically it's dumb: half the voting public would likely revolt, violently, and a sizeable portion of the other half would react negatively at the polls.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

I want to agree but I think armed resistance is often necessary as well

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I said this the night it happened- If you kill Chancellor Hitler, you get Chancellor Göring. It's a systemic issue.

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you kill Hitler in 1930 he gets replaced, if you kill Hitler in 1945 Natzi Germany falls apart. The question is has the Republican Party become a personality cult yet?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Personality cults can find successors to the original cult founder. See: Joseph Smith and Brigham Young.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I always thought it was "Bring 'em young" and referred to pedophiles.

I guess I wasn't too far off.