this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Pleasant Politics

143 readers
7 users here now

Politics without the jerks.

This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read !santabot@slrpnk.net for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.

Rules

Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.

All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.

No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
auk@slrpnk.net
santa@slrpnk.net
1
Discussion: US Foreign Policy and State Sponsored Terrorism (slrpnk.net)
submitted 4 months ago by auk@slrpnk.net to c/pleasantpolitics@slrpnk.net
0 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Here's how to do it:

You can make a strong argument that the United States has been a major sponsor of international terrorism throughout the 20th century and up until the present.

Is that still going on? Is support for Israel terrorism? Has it gotten better in the 21st century? Is it relevant what other countries have done, or what good things the US also does?

@lulztard@feddit.org I don't know whether this post will be any more useful than the other one, but the other one was pure hostility. You can't pick a fight with a whole community and start ordering them around and expect the conversation to go anywhere good. It's not your subject matter, it's your delivery.

I think it has a better chance of turning into a real conversation. If this one turns into a waste of time, too, I'll delete it, too, but I want to give a chance to this conversation, because the subject matter is fine.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here