this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

5230 readers
158 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

tl;dr EEVDF CPU scheduler that has replaced Linux's previous default scheduler (CFS), is close to completion. CPU schedulers can have a significant effect on performance and latency of various tasks.

It will be interesting to see how it compares to BORE which is what I use on my desktop systems. There's also the many workload specific schedulers that sched_ext allows for, but it's still not in mainline I believe.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] dinckelman@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I still compile my kernels with BORE. Based on the graphs I've seen, you still get a slight edge in framerate in games, and on-par performance for everything else, which is exactly what I want. Otherwise, you really cant go wrong with EEVDF at this point

[โ€“] AceSLS@ani.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

For gaming PDS is king for stable frametimes and fast response times

Bore is close second

EEVDF is very good too

I also hope you're compiling with llvm and full lto for maximum snappiness