this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023

15 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers

324 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

Is mastodon.social defederated by a notable amount of other instances? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by Jezebelley@lemmy.world to c/technology@beehaw.org

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm currently on mastodon.social for my instance, and I was informed the other day that because of poor moderation it's been permanently defedereated by enough instances to make it an issue for users there to have reach outside of their home instance. Is this true? Should I move to a different mastodon instance? Thank you!

top 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] SamC@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 year ago

I was on an instance that limited mastodon.social, which means you don't normally see posts from there, and anyone on there that wants to follow you needs permission. But if you follow people there, their posts will appear normally in your feed.

Because of its size, I think a lot of instances are hesitant to defederate completely... (but that's part of the problem with having such a big instance). I think quite a few limit it though. Some instances list all instances they limit/block and might even have a reason why they do it, but some don't seem to have any info about that at all.

I moved to an instance where it wasn't limited. Haven't noticed a huge difference, either in terms of increased activity or higher levels of abusive posts/bad behaviour.

[–] Nolando@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would also like to know more about instances being defederated and for what reason this might be happening.

[–] knova@links.dartboard.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can help fill in some of the gaps. Mastodon.social is the flagship instance so you get a bunch of people signing up for it, and at times I think some of the reports overwhelm the moderation team. A few weeks ago there was a big issue with spam bots getting through. Some instance owners have a short fuse for this kind of stuff so they opted to defed from it.

Personally, I’m running a small instance so I did not block it. I follow a lot of accounts from there. The spam bots were annoying though.

[–] Nolando@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Okay, that clicks with other things I’ve heard recently. Thank you.

[–] Joker@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Spam and bots like other people have said. Then there are the instances that get blocked because of the content and people there. Nazis, racists, trolls, etc. They were coming in from all over during the twitter migration. There was a blocklist on GitHub that was being updated pretty frequently.

[–] stefenauris@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I do know of several instances that throttle or defederate mastodon.social so that part is true. Fortunately migration is fairly straightforward if you're worried about that though!

[–] BoneALisa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the reason for defederating from them? Aren't they like the original Masto instance? What kind of moderation issues are going on there?

[–] SamC@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The reasons I've seen given is that it's a huge instance and at one point only had 1 moderator. So when instance admins complained about a user there, they didn't always get a response. I think they've got more moderators there now, but not sure if it's solved the problem.

Some Mastodon admins are very concerned about protecting their users from abuse, and want to limit it as much as possible. And that might be 100% appropriate for their users... people who don't like it should move to a different instance.

[–] BoneALisa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, that would make sense. I could definitely see that being annoying, especially considering the sheer number of users on that instance.

[–] nhgeek@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I'm curious to understand their reasons, too.

[–] manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech 1 points 1 year ago

ahhh so this is why it seems like mastadon is less diverse than lemmy already!

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 1 points 1 year ago

In Lemmy, you can click on Instances (bottom right) to see a list of federated and defederated instances.

From my point of view (lemmy.click), mastodon.social is federated.

[–] BobQuasit@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Interesting. Is there any instance which specifically will not defederate from any other?

[–] seedling@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

there are some, but they tend to quickly become spam and nazi instances. I'm guessing even those ones defederate from the instances that only serve malware though

[–] Jezebelley@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is what I want to know. I don’t want to be in a walled garden.

load more comments