Because we don't have enough patent trolls already, I guess.
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37712 readers
539 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The author seems to have defined all patents owned by patent trolls as "bad patents" while in reality a bad patent is one that should not have been granted in the first place. Patent trolls definitely own "good patents" as well and don't realize any advantage by purposely seeking out invalid patents to enforce.
Otherwise, interesting that the office seems to believe the number of IPRs requiring determination are too high? Wonder how relevant the post-covid backlog was to this decision