Musk's logo for "X" is literally just Unicode Character “𝕏” (U+1D54F).
Which means that #Musk can't trademark the logo.
Technology
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
The good news is that "x com" can be trademarked.
The bad news is that "x com" is already trademarked.
That's not accurate. Copyright and trademark are two different things. The name "twitter" is also just a combination of preexisting characters and the word was probably in use before the company was founded. You can still trademark existing things because trademarks are about preventing consumer confusion, not protecting original creations.
Musk does have a problem with copyright if it turns out this specific design was made by someone else.
The US Patent and Trademark Office is generally reluctant to enforce single-letter trademarks, and some countries ban them outright.
Does Musk even have any “In-house” designers anymore? Figured those were let got with the rest of the teams.
fonts are ridiculously cheap if you're a billionaire. Musk is stupid, but I doubt he'd be so stupid he didn't pay the like $200 fee.
You'd be surprised
If your font has the potential to be made into a logo, you would think the designer would have the sense to negotiate a higher rate. I have no idea if that's how it is in practice, but to do otherwise seems quite foolish.
His boring is your life that you feel like this is something important enough to think about, no less write rants about?