this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
222 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39381 readers
97 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/2399016

Twitter’s new X logo wasn’t made by an in-house designer. It’s from an old podcast hosted by one of the cult that Elon took from his replies.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] negativenull@negativenull.com 54 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Musk's logo for "X" is literally just Unicode Character “𝕏” (U+1D54F).
Which means that #Musk can't trademark the logo.

https://mastodon.social/@Rii_cck@mas.to/110768836422832847

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 21 points 2 years ago

The good news is that "x com" can be trademarked.

The bad news is that "x com" is already trademarked.

[–] koper@feddit.nl 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's not accurate. Copyright and trademark are two different things. The name "twitter" is also just a combination of preexisting characters and the word was probably in use before the company was founded. You can still trademark existing things because trademarks are about preventing consumer confusion, not protecting original creations.

Musk does have a problem with copyright if it turns out this specific design was made by someone else.

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 28 points 2 years ago

The US Patent and Trademark Office is generally reluctant to enforce single-letter trademarks, and some countries ban them outright.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 2 years ago

That is a better source then cross posting from lemmy.ml. Thanks.!

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

Does Musk even have any “In-house” designers anymore? Figured those were let got with the rest of the teams.

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

fonts are ridiculously cheap if you're a billionaire. Musk is stupid, but I doubt he'd be so stupid he didn't pay the like $200 fee.

[–] SafetyGoggles@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago

You'd be surprised

[–] nzodd@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

If your font has the potential to be made into a logo, you would think the designer would have the sense to negotiate a higher rate. I have no idea if that's how it is in practice, but to do otherwise seems quite foolish.

[–] JuliusSeizure@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago

His boring is your life that you feel like this is something important enough to think about, no less write rants about?

load more comments
view more: next ›