this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
255 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
138 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What's your opinion? Does google really "not work" anymore? Are there any better search engines? Why did the quality of search results go down? I honestly stumbled onto this question through this music video, what is ironic in it's own way i feel...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Google is definitely iffy for me, which is why I've been bouncing between alternates. A lot of people like to complain about how google is filled with ads and spam results like Pinterest, but even then it just doesn't really seem to give accurate results anymore, and even when results are accurate it's very surface level. From what I found, it loves to push listicle articles and such when googling a new topic, as opposed to say, Wikipedia or an encyclopedia article. Like if I search about Barbie, I'll probably get a bunch of ScreenRant-esque articles before I get the IMDB page. There have been dozens of instances of me searching for controls for video games and getting clickbait-y articles, some of which barely even make an attempt to answer the question, before getting an IGN or GameFaqs article that's to-the-point and answers my fucking question.

There are definitely better search engines out there, but they all have their own flaws. DuckDuckGo is pretty bare bones and can also give poor results if your search is too vague. You have to adapt to that one. Others like Brave have AI to help out with summaries and stuff, but Brave's management is "problematic" and so some people might not want to support them.

TL;DR: on google, not only is there ads and spam, but it's just hard to find answers anymore. Everything is clickbait. And with other options, they are good but they also have their own major flaws that some might find unappealing.

[–] any1th3r3@beehaw.org 34 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Exactly, I've noticed this over the past few months, actual relevant results are being pushed much further down the stack.

If you want to explore alternatives, I've been using SearXNG, a so-called "metasearch engine", where you can get a combination of various search engine results, based on your preferences. It's pretty good, when it works (it tends to get rate-limited fairly often... or at least some of its results / search engines do, which can get annoying).

[–] kurogane@lm.helilot.com 17 points 1 year ago

Self-hoster of a searxNG here. With docker, your can spin your own in 1 minute top. I'll never go back to any other search engine, this is the best (imho).

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can also selfhost SearxNG with modest hardware and side step the rate limits. I love it. Happy to answer any questions

[–] sylverstream@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does it compare to Kagi?

I can't self host it, what's the problem with using an existing instance?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kurogane@lm.helilot.com 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brave's marketing has always made me uneasy, but it was more like a vague thought. This why I'm intrigued by your opinion. Do you have examples of their "problematic" management?

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's of course biased, maybe for some people it wouldn't be problematic, but the CEO of brave has historically donated to organizations and California state bills that opposed same-sex marriage. This was around 15 years ago (2008 and 2009) so maybe he's changed. But for some people, that might be a dealbreaker. He resigned from Mozilla in 2014 because it came to light that he had made these donations. He apologized in 2014, but for some people that might not be enough.

(note: I'm not trying to be biased with this. For some people reading this, his apology might be perfectly fine for you. But, for others this might be enough to be labeled "problematic.")

[–] kurogane@lm.helilot.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oooh I agree, this is some actual dirt

[–] Molehill8244@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

To focus more on the product there are 2 incidents I think of as to why I don't use brave

honorable mention is their affiliation with crypto

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Thalestr@beehaw.org 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

SEO and AI-generated clickbait have basically ruined most search engines. I've yet to find one that can really tackle this properly. I believe Kagi offers higher quality results but I can't really verify that myself as I don't have an account with them.

[–] djquadratic@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

kagi seems very enticing to me, but man thats expensive... anyone here use it?

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I got work to pay for it. It is pretty good, and I like the lenses function (focus on just forums or other ways to sort). I can't say that it's necessarily better in general than startpage.com, which is anonomized google (gets you out of the filter bubble though). I feel like Kagi is very slightly better, maybe 10 percent at most.

I also don't love the hard ID they have on you for payment. They claim not to track you but they certainly can, and I'd argue better than Google can if you use startpage.com or whatever anonomized version.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] asap@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I have the $10/mo account but I'll disagree with @mrmanager@lemmy.today that it's worth the money.

Don't get me wrong I wouldn't go back to Google/DDG, but while I can afford Kagi's monthly cost I don't believe that everyone can, nor do I think it's an appropriate cost for a search engine.

I feel like I am an average search user, and I easily burn through 1000 searches a month. I'll possibly be upgrading to the $25/mo unlimited account.

If you're used to doing conversion searches like "100 USD in EUR", or "2.5g in oz", or even "20 * 12%" - you get charged for each of those. That doesn't seem so reasonable to me.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It hasn't worked for a while. Even a year ago it was considerably better.

I can't believe it, but Bing is now the better search engine. What is happening to the world?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find google works fine if I'm just looking for general information on a simple topic, because it will dependably return a link to the wikipedia entry and a few of the most popular sites.

And I find that it's pretty much useless for specific information about narrow topics, because it's still just going to return the same general shit.

I'm not sure exactly how the change worked, but some time back (it's been a year or two now, and maybe more - it's just something that I sort of slowly realized had happened), they shifted to a system that made Google Fu essentially useless.

It used to be the case that you could define the importance of search terms by the order in which you listed them and make some effectively required by putting quotation marks around them.

But starting a couple of years back, it's been generally ignoring search term order and quotation marks, and instead giving priority to specific common (and certainly not coincidentally common marketing) terms.

To anthropomorphize, it's as if it's developed a cripplingly narrow focus. So if, for instance, you're looking for the title of some specific movie, it doesn't matter how many other search terms you include or what order you list the terms in - if you include the term "movie," that's what it's going to focus on. So if you're lucky, you might get the actual movie you're looking for, but it's absolutely guaranteed that you're going to get streaming services and "18 movies with real blood" style clickbait.

[–] Rashnet@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

It's complete shit right now. 5 or more years ago I could quickly find an answer to a very technical question with no problem. Now it is useless for anything. Just today I was looking for a shop near me that can perform a front end alignment on my RV, I searched for "Tractor Trailer front end alignment near me". The entire first page is either tire shops that do not offer front end alignments, car tire shops that don't even sell the correct size tires I would need for a tractor trailer, or shops 2000 miles away in various directions. It's horrible and I think it would be faster to look in the yellow pages for what I need in this case. I never found a shop using google.

Also today I was searching for the tires I need in the shopping tab there were ads for tires that google had labeled as wal-mart but when I would click the link it would take me to a Chinese scam site.

[–] SimonSing@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Google is almost impossible to use when I search for solutions to maths problems. The first few pages are dominated by those sites gaming Google's algorithm and their articles usually don't help.

[–] ammorok@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Have you tried WolframAlpha? It can break down math problems and is a wealth of information for just about everything

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TheOtherJake@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Google is broken because AI is making it obsolete. I bet in 10 years google will be a historical footnote.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AI is driving me mad. Pages and pages of generative text filled articles with nothing to say drive all the humans away.

Ironically, because Lemmy is so hard to index for search engines, it keeps the AI content spammers away. Mostly. So far.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago

Hard agree with you on that. AI generated articles are a disaster for the internet. There's just no quality control any more, especially when actual authoritative sites are no longer in the top search results. Now we've got tons more crap-tier content on the internet and no way to differentiate it from the useful content.

[–] Metaright@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phi1997@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're talking about the AI that provides accurate-sounding results but can't fact-check and is also used to generate the kind of spam that's constantly being pushed by search engines, right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think google made the web worse with SEO. Sites have to be designed in ways that users and creators do not really care about so that they may show up in search results.

If I have a site about star trek and it has all the relevant information that the user is looking for, then do not derank my site because the text is not a specific length or whatever other unrelated stuff is there.

I think there are some things that are worth while, like I think https sites are preferred over http sites. I think that this is a good thing to promote.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

My Google results change like the weather. Sometimes I can't take it anymore and use Bing but quickly switch back as it's worse. There's no replacement yet, but you need more google Fu than ever before.

[–] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have been using AI chat exclusively for searching for at least the past 3 days.

It is so much better in every possible way for simple factual questions, especially ChatGPT and Google Bard. Great for shopping. Microsoft Bing is okay, but you have to choose the right personality.

Sidenote: I KNOW using Google, and the other companies I will mention, is the antithesis of freedom and privacy. Yet, they are incredibly powerful tools that are getting implemented everywhere, so my curiousity has led me down an honestly fun rabbit hole.

The other AI that really surpised me is Opera Aria. Like Bing, it is using ChatGPT-4 and integrating real-time information. It just feels smarter, or perhaps more professional?

The caveat with all these except maybe Bard which, uses its own system, are very good at shutting down questions it does not want to answer. It feels weird and wrong when it happens, like it just saved you from asking something immoral, or at least too many questions about the tech.

Strange experience overall.


TL;DR AI chatbots are great at parsing the internet to get you answers with reasonable accuracy and relevancy when old-fashioned search can be tedious or fruitless.

[–] Creesch@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Bing and Google Bard keep disappointing me. Bing for some reason only picks up on half of what I ask. Which is extremely odd as it is supposedly is ChatGPT based and ChatGPT gives pretty good answers on the same queries. The only problem with the latter is that a lot of it is of course outdated.

Bard might just be broken for me. I keep getting I'm a text-based AI, and that is outside of my capabilities. or similar responses.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] minishoemaze@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Nothing to add to this discussion except that savannahxyz is a treasure

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

tl;dw: song about google being broken

"I have to add to word reddit to every goddamn search to read content made by humans"

Oh the ironing. That line won't age well now will it :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HisNoodlyServant@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Seems to mostly work fine for me. However Google as a company is a fucking mess so doesn't surprise me people have problems. I have had more problems with my Pixel 7 and Google Maps seems to getting worse and worse.

[–] abhibeckert@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What’s your opinion? Does google really “not work” anymore?

Depends what you're searching for. For some searches I've given up on using it. For example I just purchased a new TV and one of the features wasn't working. It took me several hours of Googling to figure out how to fix it — almost every result offered by Google didn't contain an answer to my question.

Are there any better search engines?

ChatGPT works well for some searches. Especially if you pay for GPT-4.

It's pretty impressive how ChatGPT is better than Google despite never being designed as a replacement for Google. I think when someone applies the same technology to a proper search product, the result will be really awesome. Time will tell who manages to pull that off - it might even be Google.

Why did the quality of search results go down?

The main issue, I think, is all the websites these days that exist exclusively to show banner ads. Many of them are packed with information that Google's algorithm determines might be relevant to the user, but the algorithm is wrong.

The websites want you to click on an Ad, and you're a lot more likely to click an Ad if you give up, don't find what you're looking for, and decide to buy a new weight loss gadget instead.

I'm sure part of the problem is Google itself is an ad company. A lot of the things they could do to fix this issue would harm their own revenue.

[–] Pietson@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

did not expect to see a savannahXYZ video on my feed here this morning, love to see it though.

[–] NuMetalAlchemist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have been having better luck with goddamn BING, ffs. Do you realize how embarrassing that is, Google?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dragna@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mojeek has been an interesting alternative. I do find myself using google as a backup when I’m not getting what I need, but Mojeek does tend to present very different results.

I don’t think any other search engine, including DuckDuckGo, has its own web crawler like mojeek does. DuckDuckGo is security based, but still google in the end (similar to how most browsers are actually chromium). It apparently also uses a different term algorithm so you have to readjust how you search because it doesn’t do anything predictive or “smart” in its searching for results.

[–] tantedante@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

map of search engines since i found this website a few minutes ago i consider using mojeek too... and i was surprised how few actual search engine crawlers exist....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] willeypete23@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

From googles perspective, you, the user cost them money. Their revenue comes from ads. The brands don't was to be associated with anything controversial so the results are tailored to be as PG and clean as possible.

[–] jmanes@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It works but it’s way shittier. I ended up paying for Kagi.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Metaright@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I append "site:Reddit.com" (I know, I know) to basically every search I perform. It's the only reliable way at this point to see things written genuinely by real people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›