this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
61 points (96.9% liked)

movies

1746 readers
675 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be clear, this isn't someone actually connected to the Cushing estate saying "hey man, that's not cool," because the estate did actually agree back when the film was being made eight years ago; this is some other studio claiming that, actually, it has the exclusive rights to puppeteer Peter Cushing's digital ghost, because of some contract he signed back in the '90s or whatever.

'Cause, y'know, nothing quite says "justice at work" like watching the all-consuming media conglomerate duke it out with the copyright trolls over who gets to do the deepfakes.

...Interesting that Disney has decided they should be allowed to dispute obscure fine print buried in a contract nobody could possibly remember signing...

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

All companies should be banned, I’m going to delete all copyright law and replace it with asking the king (me) and a man with a big hammer. Thanks for coming to my ted talk x