this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
423 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37748 readers
234 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sydneybrokeit@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Knowing what I know about the costs of streaming video, I really want to know what the alternative is for a platform that can't just throw money down the drain. To my mind, there are only two options here - people watch ads (within reason, but 2 hour ads aren't resonable), or people pay YouTube (a la Premium).

If you want things for free, the only way to make that happen sustainably is ads right now. Donations simply will not work, especially for something with the costs that video incurs - to say nothing about being able to compensate creators for their time and effort.

[–] Mustafaalbazy@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Whats the percentage of YT users who use Adblock tools? i think it's a tiny number, mainly the power users.

[–] Micromot@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I thought it was most people who use an adblock for yt atleast on pc. I only know q single person not using it

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

I wonder if this would affect things like Newpipe (android YouTube client replacement with no ads) or even just playing streams via MPV. I assume that stuff is relatively safe since it's grabbing the actual video streams, but I'm sure there is still a way they could block them.

[–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah please do, I will just stop using YouTube and that would be a good thing.

[–] basuramannen@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So soon we will need an adblocker blocker blocker to use YouTube?

load more comments (3 replies)

I watch youtube, I mean, who doesn't? But there is nothing on there, no creater, no content, that would stop me from going cold turkey with the site if they are actually able to pull it off.

[–] schizanon@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

laughs in SmartTube

[–] tuxedosushi@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

First trying to kill off invidious, and then this? What a world.

[–] themizarkshow@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I pay for Premium (bc I watch mostly from the TV using a console or AppleTV) but this sucks. Especially because how annoying and long a bunch of these ads are now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steinsprut@szmer.info 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I took the L and started paying for YT Premium since you can't really get rid of ads on LG TV otherwise

Did it with a bit of malicious compliance and opted for Family plan using argentinian VPN, totaling at less than $3 a month (and constantly dropping) for 5 people.

[–] gothicdecadence@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you can sideload Android apps SmartTubeNext is a great option https://github.com/yuliskov/SmartTubeNext

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Andreas@feddit.dk 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

PiHole, Adguard Home and the like can't block ads on smart TVs? Or is it something like the TV refusing to start if it contacts the ad server and doesn't get a response?

[–] Supermariofan67@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

They can block other ads, but they can't block YouTube ads since YouTube ads come from the same domains as the videos.

[–] mnrockclimber@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

PiHole blocks by preventing certain domains from loading (the ones you specify on your blocklist). It's not examining any content. It simply sees a request for say examplespamdomain.com and blocks it when something on your network requests it. Youtube serves ads and videos from the same domain, so this approach doesn't work.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

I'd be much happier to pay if I could ensure I don't get personalized recommendations and I could use it with yt-dlp. I can probably opt out of personalized recommendations, but I haven't checked yet because I don't use youtube through its main interface much.

[–] dinodrinkstea@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

They can choke

[–] blegh@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Call me lumberjack cause I wish a nigga wood pay for YouTube premium. With how many times YT tells me I’m not connected to the internet while my phone has a 3 bars of 5G (for whatever that’s worth) connection, hell naw I’m not paying for youtube premium. They move the goalpost way too often for what counts as “monetizable content” to the point that it’s neutering my favorite content creators to keep the lights on. TBH I’d rather pay Nebula

[–] green_witch@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Oh gosh, that's unfortunate.

Good thing I've been using NewPipe! I'm reading the post for other alternatives, but feel free to suggest some to me directly, if you'd like.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] A2PKXG@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Honestly, I've always been surprised as to why YouTube even tolerates adblockers. It's basically a no-brainer for them to bake ads into the stream and disable skipping

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Rule34IsAmazing@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I understand why they're doing this, but if you make a service that was once free, paid, it's not a good look.

[–] CoffeeBlood91@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Now we need a new video platform.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Well, this certainly explains my difficulty with YouTube over the last few days. Ironically, the piped instances still seem to be fine...

This might just be enough to push me primarily over to Rumble. There are fewer and fewer reasons to use YouTube and more and more reasons not to.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›