this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
423 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
526 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jamesravey@lemmy.nopro.be 32 points 1 year ago

Wow the enshittification is at full throttle across silicon valley! Guess those investors gotta get those returns now that interest rates are spiking!

[–] mog77a@beehaw.org 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, got selected for this test and I thought my network went down.

Had to do nearly 30 mins of debugging until I realized it was youtube actively withholding JUST the video. Took some effort but managed to get them to send the videos again after resetting a bunch of things.

I refuse to view ads and will go to the ends of the earth to make that happen.

Paying is most certainly an option, but only when that becomes the ONLY option.

I've been using an adblocker since ads starting becoming more intrusive and the internet has progressed so much that it's become generally unusable without one. I remember when a mobile ad popped up on my phone and it straight up startled me.

My problem is that the money given to Youtube only very marginally gets to the creators...

[–] axtualdave@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I have had this in my ublock origin filters for quite some time. Seems to do the trick:

!www.youtube.com
##.ytp-ce-element
[–] HisNoodlyServant@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would rather not watch Youtube again then be exposed to terrible ads. I accidentally went on Youtube on Chrome and one of the ads was a straight up scam. $7.54 Switch! Like maybe if they had humans vet ads like you used to do maybe I would have less of a problem with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ubergeek77@lemmy.ubergeek77.chat 17 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Alternate headline: Users test using only YouTube ReVanced to bypass this new system

[–] tuxedosushi@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

YouTube Revanced is a savior

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago

and I'm testing Youtube Revanced on my phone for unlimited ad-free background play for nothing!

[–] gigachad@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

We'll find a way around it, if not go to hell YT. Apart from posters in the real world, I am living a 100% ad-free life and I'm super happy about it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

This should go quite well for YouTube. popcorn gif

[–] vraylle@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At least with my subscriptions I've been noticing an increase in sponsored segments. And you know what? I don't mind. It's much less jarring when the "host" is also doing the ad and pretty much just works it into the video. People have to make money, and this old-school approach works for me. Reminds me of ads in old TV/radio shows. And it doesn't suddenly change the scene and quadruple the volume along with seizure-inducing backgrounds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkGamer@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This will lead to an increase of ad-blocker-blocker-blocker development.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

The ad blocking arms race churns ever onward

[–] Pekka@feddit.nl 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Although not nice for people that can't afford or don't want YouTube premium, this makes a lot of sense. Hosting videos costs a lot of money, and I doubt the YouTube Premium subscribers pay even nearly enough to pay for the hosting of all these videos. Personally I just have YouTube Premium as this also gives more money to the creators that make these videos.

I think an Open Source alternative would also have a lot of trouble with receiving enough funding to stay up. It would require a lot more donation compared to hosting mostly text based sites like Lemmy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stagen@feddit.dk 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fuck youtube anyway. Absolute sesspit of influencers, ads and stolen content.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

That entirely depends on who your subscribed to. Personally all my stuff channels like Numberphile/computerphile, or SmarterEveryDay, and plenty of Blender3d tutorial channels, animators, and a whole bunch of other informative channels.

[–] slashzero@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While YouTube, or any service, has bad users/channels, there are also many great users/channels for people with varying interests to enjoy. You can ignore the channels you don’t like, and get to watch some of the best content from regular people you’ve never heard of, who aren’t major television studios or corporations with an agenda. All they want to do is make videos of things they are passionate about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FujiTive@lemmy.fmhy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I use YouTube a lot, both on my phone via ReVanced and my smart TV via SmartTubeNext, completely ad free. If Youtube manage to block videos unless the users deactivate their adblockers, even if I enjoy Youtube a lot, I'll just stop watching videos. The quantity of ad per video is just insane. No way I can stand watching all those ads.

[–] wiredfire@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I don’t disagree, YouTube won’t care. Currently folk like you and I who evade their ads are freeloading. We get all the content and YouTube gets nothing in return. Having those who block ads abandon watching doesn’t lose YouTube anything, and maybe saves them a little bandwidth bill I guess?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unpopular opinion around these parts, I imagine, but I bought a family sub.

Me and 5? 6? other people get ad-free viewing, the creators get a little more for our views, and no worries about finding ad-blocking youtube viewers for my in law's smart-tvs or my idevices.

edit: after reading the rest of this thread the opinion isn't so unpopular

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unpopular opinion: I like paying for YouTube Premium to get rid of ads and still make it possible for creators and YouTube to get paid and survive an keep offering me entertainment.

In addition you also get YouTube Music so no need to pay for Spotify. It might not have as good features but I listen to music specifically so I only search for what I want to listen to and don't want any algorithms anyway.

[–] mondoman712@iusearchlinux.fyi 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I pay for nebula, which is significantly cheaper and has a lot of creators that I am interested in supporting, plus extra content from them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

God the ads are awful. If they start blocking apps like Vanced and Browsers like brave, i will make a PiHole. And they can never block it.

[–] catra@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately this is a question that comes up very often in the Pi-Hole community where the answer is always: no, a Pi-Hole cannot block YouTube ads.

This is because a pihole blocks at the DNS level and YouTube serves their ads from the YouTube.com domain. Block that and you lose full access to the site.

They recommend running either uBlock Origin alongside it and/or use apps such as newpipe for android and freetube for desktop.

That said, I will always recommend setting up a Pi-Hole if you're able to as the benefits of blocking trackers and ads from the entire network (which includes your cellphones, smart TVs, printers, IP cameras, etcetera) is definitely a good thing. Once set up it is 99% a "set it and forget it" kind of setup.

[–] Bandicoot_Academic@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

I think a pi hole dosen't work for youtube ads.

Piholes rely on blocking DNS requests to ad servers, but on youtube the servers that host the videos and the servers that host the ads are the same thing.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If they really block adblockers, I will subscribe. To Nebula. It's got everything I want, adfree (including sponsored segments), extra content and is cheaper. And the content creators get a bigger share of the money.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] xontinuity@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

YouTube is going to have a lot of trouble enforcing this. Lots and lots of people out there are going to be immediately at work finding ways around this limitation.

[–] stargazer@lemmy.fmhy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Fuck youtube and fuck their ads, this shit is getting out of hand

[–] WondrousFairy@lemmy.fmhy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Translation: YT tests randomly pissing off users until they get fed up and leave for another site. if a site tells me I can't partake of their content with my adblocker engaged, I simply find my fix elsewhere.

[–] Plume@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I pay for Prenium. But that's only because I also use YouTube Music. Otherwise, I wouldn't pay for it and I would do everything that I can to get rid of the ads. YouTube with ads is just hell now. There are so many of them now, it's ridiculous.

Don't get me wrong, I recognise the value that YouTube provides. Most things I watch and listen to are on YouTube. It's the website I use the most and I'll be glad to pay for it. I understand that it costs money to run and I want to support the creators that I watch.

HOWEVER.

I refuse to be strong armed into paying for it. Music brings me the value that I want and comparing with other prices, such as Spotify and so on, the actual "YouTube" part of the package just cost me 1€ per month which is one hell of a deal if you ask me.

But if you don't care for YouTube Music, 11€ a month (worst in the US apparently), just to get rid of ads is... ridiculous. I'd happily pay 5€ a month. It's not much and for the thing that I use the most? Yeah, I'm willing to! And I know that there is YouTube Prenium Lite. However, it's not available everywhere and it comes with a giant "fuck you" to the costumer.

You see, YouTube Prenium Lite is YouTube without ads. And that's it. So, no Background Play (which I use ALL THE TIME), no downloading of videos, none of that. You want that, well, you have to pay full price. Even though these are basic features.

Paying for getting rid of ads is one thing, and maybe accessing special features is one thing. But paying for artificial limitations that are put into place? Absolutely not. And I know the line between what's a prenium feature and what's an artifical limit is blurry. But for me it's basically this: If I can do something for free on desktop, but can't on mobile without paying. Such as background play.

I am convinced YouTube Prenium would be way more appealing if YouTube weren't being such dicks about it.

It's simple:

  • Get your prices back to normal (I hear that in the US, prices have been going up for... no reason).
  • Roll out YouTube Prenium Lite to everyone and rename it YouTube Prenium. So it has all the features of current Prenium except YouTube Music (put ads and disable background play only on music videos?).
  • Make it at like 5 bucks a month.
  • Make a variety of plans based around that. So a Prenium Family and also, a Prenium Duo, just like Spotify, for just two people. Reasonably priced.
  • And you make a YouTube Prenium Music plan, which includes YouTube Music as well. So on top of all of that, for 11 bucks a month, you now have a really compelling offer because you can go, Hey, for just 5 more bucks a month, you get all of the features of YouTube Prenium AND you get a complete music streaming services.
  • Oh and also: STOP DOING THIS SHIT.

Bam. All of the sudden you have compelling options. Some people will say: "Uuuh, jUsT uSe an AdbLocKeR!" and whatever. Those people are not the majority, so many people watch YouTube from their phones and their TVs now, they will be much more inclined to buy it...

...I think.

That last part is important. I recognise I'm just playing armchair business developper here and that I don't know shit, but still. I'm convinced this could work. The real issue comes down to YouTube being a monopoly and thinking that they can do whatever the hell they want, which... they likely can, due to the position they're in. It's an issue but this comment is already long enough and that is another discussion entirely, but basically: Monopolies sucks.

[–] Deathsservant@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry, I know this isn't a constructive comment, but I had a real good chuckle seeing your autocorrect (?) writing Prenium every single time 😂

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jon@lemmy.tf 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've got most of the channels I sub to tracked by yt-dl so it all gets pulled to my nas. If Youtube starts forcing ads I'll just put some effort into getting things categorized properly into Plex and ditch their site.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SevYote@pawb.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For folks considering paying for YT, note that you get YT Music Premium bundled in with it. The music premium alone is only $2/mo cheaper than the bundle.

I got it when I bailed on Spotify, and gotta say, the app is a little less polished, but I don't miss Spotify a bit. Just putting it out there if you were looking for a push to get yourself off Spotify or a push to get YT ad-free, there ya go. It works out to $10/mo if you get the annual plan, so same as Spotify Premium, plus yanno, the YouTube benefits. It's a pretty decent deal tbh.

[–] dr0037@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago

While we are saying "fuck reddit", let's say "fuck you too YT". Fucking malware machine.

[–] chriskoss@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Youtube ads are such garbage. Everyone talks about how google is 'the most advanced advertiser' - well google, you really can't figure out that playing the same ad for me 4 times in a 30 minute period is just going to make me hate both you and the advertiser?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] albert180@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

So PeerTube is seeing uptake soon :D ?

[–] sam@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'd be happy to pay for video content/video hosting, but I'm not happy with any of my money going to youtube or google. Peertube is the future. 😎

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] IronTwo@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, I pay for YouTube Premium because I find value in it. The price is reasonable for where I live, and it's my main source of entertainment. I don't like watching movies/TV shows that much so YouTube is my jam. So the convenience of being able to download videos, ad-free viewing, picture-in-picture, background playback etc. is totally worth it for me. I know if I dig hard enough and use an Android phone/tablet I can get those features without having to pay, but I don't like Android and again, the features are worth the small price.

For me, YouTube Premium and Spotify broke piracy because they're more convenient than pirating.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mindcruzer@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Honestly if I worked at YouTube and they asked me to implement this I'd quit.

[–] fennec@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yet another platform to boycott? Excellent!

[–] Soullioness@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right! I'm enjoying all these FOSS alternatives lately. I really hope they're here to stay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sangle_of_flame@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Oh, cool; more reason to use Piped and Invidious lmao

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] uglytruck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I use ytdl-sub to downloadt the newest videos from the channels I like and import into Jellyfin. No ads, nothing, just videos. Even thumbnails.

[–] Starya68@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

If I wanted to watch 15 minutes of ads in a 45 minute video, I'd just get cable. I'm happy to watch 1 or 2 ads before a video. That's it. So I use an app that can even remove promotions.

[–] basuramannen@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So soon we will need an adblocker blocker blocker to use YouTube?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›