this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

PCGaming

6500 readers
5 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

If this means more affordable mid-range GPUs, I'm all for it. Very few people can afford 4090s anyway and competing in this space gives you nothing but bragging rights.

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So they are going with the “if you want cheap, buy AMD or if you want fast buy Nvidia” approach. That will work out well for them, not.

[–] yggdar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It is more of a "For typical cards, expect very competitive options from AMD. If you want top performance, buy Nvidia."

In theory it allows them to focus more on the cards that actually get bought, and thus they could make those cards better products.