this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
-5 points (0.0% liked)

politics

19073 readers
3979 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blazera@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Democrats do not want democracy

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Weird thing to say about a group that routinely takes majorities in national elections.

Surely a party that, on a good day, gets 1% of the vote, and on a bad day, can’t manage to file the right paperwork to get on the ballot, is really what the people want.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh man wait til you hear about the Workers Party of Korea if election success is your measurement of democracy support.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, that’s definitely a relevant and insightful comparison to the US electoral system.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If electoral success is your standard, then yes. The US is way more comparable to third world fascist states than anyone wants to admit, and a dominant political party leveraging its power to ban competition is one such similarity.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I thought this decision was made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For extra context the PA supreme court is majority democrat

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are you arguing that the decision wasn’t made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility?

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] blazera@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is just a long page of comments on this post on my end.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s a link to an article titled ‘Claudia De la Cruz slams Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to kick her off 2024 ballot’.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes thats what we are currently discussing. They done the paperwork, they got the signatures.

But uh oh democrats decided those signatures arent allowed, in a challenge brought upon by democrats to a democrat controlled supreme court.

Just a reminder you are arguing against letting a political party participate in an election. The gravity of that is immense to me, i think it would be to you too if you were seeing it from an outside perspective. Like we see Russia banning candidates.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought this decision was made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility.

Actually this is what I’m arguing.

It’s a couple comments up if you’d like to see yourself.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes they did. They jumped through all the hoops and got all the electors they needed.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

Not according to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] blazera@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

following a challenge supported by the Democratic donor-funded, anti-third-party Clear Choice PAC.

Every story you ever see about a candidate being thrown off a ballot is prompted by a democratic effort to do so. There are multiple such stories posted today, ill let you go look into their context.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Pennsylvania high court agreed with a Commonwealth Court decision to bar De la Cruz and her running mate, Karina Garcia, from the ballot.

That’s the rest of the sentence that you forgot about.

Every story you ever see about a candidate being thrown off a ballot is prompted by a democratic effort to do so.

Did you even read the second paragraph because it’s about a republican effort to remove a candidate.

Pennsylvania justices also ruled against the Constitution Party's James Clymer, whose name was listed as a placeholder for the party, delivering a victory to Republicans.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

None of this addresses any of my accusations?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m pointing out that your accusation is fundamentally flawed.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Oh whoops, i did say only democrats do it. I didnt know there even were conservative third parties still around. I democrats and republicans are anti-democratic

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (20 children)

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡

Yes, the Democrats don't want democracy at all because they follow the laws and regulations required to get a candidate into the actual elections, and aren't complete fools who show up late to the party accusing everyone else for being the problem.

It's clearly Democrats' fault that this ticket is incompetent. You ever wonder why they're only making noise in swing states and not bothering with the Bible Belt states at all?

Ever wonder why that may be?

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›