this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
0 points (50.0% liked)

politics

19091 readers
3691 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This time around, the US has seized a network of Russian-run internet domains, and sanctioned ten people including Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of RT (formerly Russia Today), for “activities that aim to deteriorate public trust in our institutions”. Sanctions include freezing any property or assets in the US, and potentially restrictions on any US citizen or company that works with them.

Here are five key features of Russian information manipulation we identified, and which can help understand the latest election-meddling scandal.

  1. Using local influencers
  1. Fake news outlets
  1. Adding fuel to the fire
  1. Flipping the script
  1. Humour
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do I sign up to be a “victim” of Russian payments?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 months ago

They're just trying to lay the groundwork for someone to blame if they lose.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I actually get made pretty uncomfortable by the xenophobia about 'election meddling' every couple years about 'the russians' like we're some monolith, sometimes I post about it. But I guess that's me the (#1) local influencer posting on the (#2) fake news outlet lemmy.ml, clearly trying to goad people (#3) with my (#4) flipping the script takes and unfunny bits (#5) 😕

WTF Putin why aren't you paying me already, do you have any idea how much rent in America costs??

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 months ago

I see what you did there. Very humorous.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Dear reader,

I am writing to you today to remind you of how Russia intends on manipulating the election. Russia's not the only one, but Russia's got a vested interest in influencing our election.

Come next January, one of two people will take the Oath of Office. One of them is a neoliberal squishy centre-left politician with a history of saying anything to get elected, but taking the moderate approach. The other...is an Authoritarian shithead with a band of utter and complete assholes behind him that plan on grinding anyone and everyone that disagrees with them by any degree under a jackboot heel. And the Russians have a clear choice in this.

They want the guy who will let them take over Ukraine without interfering.

They like the guy that has the same opinions on gays and transgendered people that they do -- something to be crushed and oppressed.

They want the guy who will tear down our alliances with other countries over money.

They want us to become isolated and withdraw from world affairs.

And they are willing to do anything necessary to make that happen.

And they have been caught in the act making that guy more likely to win.

The article lists 5 key ways by which they influence our elections. The one I want to focus the most on is the third one. "Adding fuel to the fire." Here, we see their goal of amplifying our divisions. They definitely target the Right for this, making Conservatives beyond angry about LGBTQ issues, but they go beyond that to target divisions on the Left. One key way they do this is by convincing left-wing voters that their candidates aren't 'pure' enough and thus they should stay home. And they do this by creating fake news outlets and leveraging mouthpieces here in the USA.

So, consider this when you see the 13th article in a day by a divisive personality here pushing the meme that you should vote third party or stay home because the Democrat isn't liberal enough for them. While I will not, and indeed cannot directly call out any of these personalities as being part of the Russian Disinformation Operation due to the Civility Rule (and the fact that they may just be True Believers (tm) in really stupid ideas), I can with certainty say that the Russians are trying to manipulate you out of your vote. Consider that as you read each of the articles these people are posting.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 months ago

Tried to circumvent the civility rule by with vague terminology is just as uncivil and will be reported as such.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Out of all the types of American political voters that exist (as defined and studied by Pew), the progressive left has the highest voting rate of any group. Including 'Faith and Flag Conservatives.'

If you're super worried about criticism from someone further left than you killing support for your candidate, it's not because leftists don't show up to vote.

'Transgendered' is best left in the 2000s btw.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 2 months ago

Well said. Even if someone is not directed by (or a member of) propaganda efforts, they should be wary that their message does not align with those efforts.

Of course diverse opinions are welcome, but incremental positive change often requires unity around a centrist candidate leaning your way. The left side of the spectrum definitely has more friction here, as they are usually thoughtful, independent people with a wider exposure to ideas.