this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
105 points (99.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6456 readers
1390 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Three grams of explosive on a custom board, that they can detonate at will.

Kinda terrifying actually.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andrewth09@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I feel like this should unironically be a war crime. The potential for collateral is ridiculously high.

Edit: I'm amazed at how successfully this is being spun as a highly-targeted, high-precision attack with no collateral when it's pretty much the opposite. You can't control what they do with the pagers after they get them. Ffs there were kids killed.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago

I saw a post earlier on my mastodon mentioning this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_on_Mines,_Booby-Traps_and_Other_Devices I do see "portable objects" mentioned, but given that the section is otherwise about stuff associated with children, I'm not sure if pagers would qualify or not.

[–] Streetlights@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine if one of those pagers had been on a plane...

[–] fist_of_fartitude@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

An ounce of high explosive won't take down a plane. Even at cruising altitude.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

It may not take it down but it would likely not end well. Also an ounce of certain explosives is a lot more destructive than others.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

If the pilots each had one and they were sitting on the flight console when boom boom

[–] Streetlights@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dunno, did you see the picture of what happened to the pager that was on the table? I could see that going through a few mm of aluminium.

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would someone be holding their pager against the wall of a plane?

[–] Streetlights@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're sitting in a window seat your pocket is pretty much against the hull.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's a horrifying thought. You are a gonner at that point

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Quite the supply chain attack.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If what's described in the story is accurate, this is incredibly impressive work.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 23 hours ago

It's not. Taiwanese say that pagers weren't made by them but instead these were made by their Hungarian subsidiary, but that company only has nameplate at residential address. It seems that shipment was for 5000 pagers and extra faje component was added

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Username checks out

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a wild new form of terrorist attack.

I can't think of any other time consumer goods were sabotaged in a mass fatality attack like this.

Now I'm just a tiny bit afraid my phone is about to explode in my face.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Drop it in a bucket of water. Source: I've seen many films

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Fucking nuts.

Mass detonation at the exact same time is spooky deus ex shit.

Can hear Adam Jenson narrating this news crawl

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 9 points 1 day ago

That seems pretty credible to me.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i've seen other source stating that it was something between 30 and 60g

give it a few days, nobody knows what is going on and only thing you can get are rumors. some people still think it was lithium battery

I read an article saying one type of the pagers that blew up was an Apollo AP-900, which uses triple A alkaline batteries, so there's no way a battery overload could have caused that.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pagers aren't particularly big or heavy, I think it would be hard to hide that much explosive in one.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

30-60g is a very very noticeable amount

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

You can buy cellphones that weigh less than 80g, someone would notice.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't think too much about that used laptop you got for cheap and haven't opened up.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

There was a journalist who had an attack on there life via a explosive USB drive. Luckily they plugged it into a hub first which only caused part of it to go off not the entire thing

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago

Sources is allways trustworthy.