this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
47 points (98.0% liked)

Privacy

31872 readers
335 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Need at least the camera, if not that plus a microphone and speakers, not the lock or bell.

Libre Software (Obviously) + End-to-End Encryption

Small and easy to hide, so the camera isn't stolen, attacked or bypassed.

Best answer yet

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You want Reolink + Frigate

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

Yes, I have this too. Works fine.

[–] BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I can stand behind reolink. Quality products at really good prices.

I have personally installed their cameras for multiple people and never really have issues out of them.

And check with your local telephone co-op and see if they will hook you up with free ethernet cable. All you need then is a crimper and some ends.

Love these cameras

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Cameras seem too big and obvious, easy to attack.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They have a doorbell: https://reolink.com/__/product/reolink-video-doorbell/

It doesn't really get smaller than that.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, I see, thank you!

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Unpopular opinion: an actual doorbell.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

That won't record attackers.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Add (offline, regular) camera.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

add a vandal proof camera on top

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ops. Missed the actual details. Sorry. How small you want it to be? Any dimentions?

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No specific measurements.

https://www.wyze.com/products/wyze-cam-pan

Something like this which has a privacy mode where it rotates and hides could be good.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Vandal proof camera is easy to find, but with privacy mode? I don't think such product exist yet.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I literally just linked an example.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's not vandal proof. What I mean by vandal proof is IK rated, like IK10.

Best I can find is https://www.hikvision.com/en/products/IP-Products/PTZ-Cameras/Value-Series/ds-2de2a404iw-de3-w-s6-/

You will have to set the camera pointing default to a non sensitive area, likely ground if you mount it directly above your doorbell, and only tilt up when it get some event triggers like motion (feet), audio (it does have a mic), doorbell (via home assistant), other cameras (mition alerts), or something else.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I see, thank you!

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I can't remotely see if an important package was delivered with a regular doorbell.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If that is a big problem, one alternative is to get a post office box.

[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

That's seems like a good idea, considering the plethora of videos online of packages being stolen with an obvious camera watching the thieves.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I also can't see who took my package with a regular doorbell. But apparently having security cameras on your property is dystopian surveillance.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Having security cameras that malicious businesses sell so they can scrape your data and share video with the police without your informed consent is a dystopian nightmare.

Having your own security system that is only accessed by you and those you intentionally share it with is not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

I think that is the normal choice

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can use a Wyze Video Doorbell 1 and flash it with thingino firmware. Then hook it up to a Frigate home surveillance server.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, looks good, thank you!

Will that run on a Pi? Can it shut off when I'm at home?

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Frigate can definitely run on a Pi. It can also integrate with Home Assistant which can run on a Pi. As for turning itself off when you're home, I don't know.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Best answer, thanks again!

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

You're welcome. I'm glad I could help out

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Reolink has a local encrypted video doorbell.

[–] SecurityPro@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I use Eufy doorbells, locks, and cameras. I realize they are a Chinese company, but that is almost unavoidable until the US gets back to actually manufacturing tech.

The reason I like Eufy is the local storage and no required subscription fees.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

Isn't this the company that not only got busted for uploading continuous footage but got caught publicly exposing that footage to anyone with VLC?

I if I am remembering correctly you should throw away the device immediately

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

I use eufy as well. The only issue they recently had was that thumbnails were stored in their cloud if you chose to enable them on notifications. If you just select the text option, none of the footage is stored online and everything is local.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Harder for China than the US to attack in the US.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Here's a very similar question I asked here a few months ago: "Privacy respecting ring doorbell" https://lemm.ee/post/8165932

[–] DARbarian@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Been hunting for the same thing for years

[–] kbal@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

That won't record attackers.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

It might contribute in some small aesthetic way to deterring them, which seems a much better ambition.

load more comments
view more: next ›