this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
71 points (84.5% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
4289 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I read an article that China, while yes they are the outspending US in fusion research, also have exponentially more PhD's working on the research as well.

[–] Eril@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

There are a lot more people living in China, so it makes sense too.

[–] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Maybe instead of spending billions on doing our own research, we should just steal China's. They've been doing it to us for decades.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fusion energy is still a distant pipe dream at this point. Don't believe the hype.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, I think we're getting really very close! We've been in this cycle of eternally "30 years away". These days we're in a cycle of "5-10 years away". That sounds like a joke, but we really are closing in.

Now that said, while we can eventually get fusion to work, it will absolutely not solve all of our energy problems. Once it's actually possible, it will still be the most expensive source of energy available. Which means once we can do it, we won't actually want to do it.

[–] Atrichum@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe. The people who have always said 30 years were scientists and engineers. Those now saying 5 to 10 years are VC backed startups.

Progress is definitely being made but I'll believe the optimists when I see the results.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Those now saying 5 to 10 years are VC backed startups.

It's scientists and engineers saying it, it may also be VCs, but 5-10 is the official line from engineers.

The bottom line is this, maybe one of these startups or smaller reactor designs will work, you never know. But at the end of the day, ITER is scheduled to be completed in 2034, and at that scale, it will be net energy positive, there's no doubt.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Why would China lie?!

/$

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure it is, Ozma... sure it is.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

IDGAF who "wins" just give it to us already.