Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
There’s the attack on intelligence by dismissing PhDs by basically calling them stupid and replacing intelligence with “common sense”, feels before reals.
The “experts” said shipping jobs overseas would save Americans money?
That wasn’t experts, that was business lobbyists and CEOs who wanted higher profits.
Vance trying hard to pull off Kamala’s faces from the last debate and only looking constipated.
Do people actually believe the Vice President can single handily pass legislation?
Vance is now pro-abortion exceptions? Are you kidding me?
Edit: typo
Call ing out Vance’s disdain for trump, good
vance. those economic experts have PhD's but they don't have common sense.
Does Congress need to pass bills to help border patrol?
Vance: The president has to solve it by helping law enforcement.
JD, isn't that what the bill passing through Congress would do?
We're ~25 minutes in, and so far I would say this debate is close, but Walz is edging out Vance. He's not as polished, but he's coming across as more genuine, and he's directly answering.
I really hope Walz hammers Vance on women’s rights and LGBTQ issues. Just make that the focus of the whole thing, because those are the issues that will win in the margins of historically nonvoters. I really hope this campaign can finally understand why many voters are disenfranchised, and start finally enfranchising them.
Vast swathes of voters are unaffiliated because nobody cares about them. I know the dem candidates are capable of caring, but they need to show it.
Walz nailed the immigration question. Vance is making up lies and using buzzwords.
Here we go. Yes, women’s rights.
First question is about the Middle East and Iran's attack on Israel. Walz is talking about how we need steady leadership for dealing with that, contrasting it with Trump.
Started a little stumbly, but already seems to be finding his footing.
exactly . Trump wants issues to run on, not solutions. We just saw this as he tried to manipulate the senate to not fix things so he’d have the problem to rail against and run on. This is anti-American.
Walz directly quoting Trump's promises about the wall, including the "Mexico will pay for it."
Springfield Ohio.
Please bring up cats and dogs. You know you want to. Fucking racist.
I will say, I'm enjoying this debate more than I thought I would, simply because the moderators seem competent and both debaters are behaving like actual adults, even if Vance is a makeup-wearing Yale-bot.
woohoo. walz brought up the bill and how its doing the things vance is suggested they are not doing. looking good.
It’s great that vance keeps heaping responsibility on Harris for events that happened while she was VP, events which were nothing a VP could affect.
Also, the world was “stable” under trump because tens of millions of people were dying from covid and the world was locked down. If trump wants to take responsibility for the covid virus, go for it.
Walz pointing out that Trump jokes about big storms creating more beachfront property.
Remember that Walz by his own admission is "bad at debates" and that Vance is (an admittedly insane) Yale law school graduate. Walz has done few difficult interviews, almost every mainstream interview Vance has done has been difficult because he has to defend Trump. I just think it's important to have realistic expectations.
I'm honestly not sure what to expect, but I imagine Vance will seem like a more polished politician and debater. He is awkward and supports ugly things, but he doesn't seem to get goaded easily. If Walz can summon his "everydad" persona effectively to make it appear like there's a normal candidate and weird candidate up there and use his knack for a folksy phrase or comeback, that will probably be the "takeaway."
Due to the format, these debates have kind of turned into tiktok video farming events, so let's see who gets the most meme-able sound bytes. Let the games begin.
Here we go, reproductive rights.
Not being “used” maybe the wildlife needs it?
woohoo. vance. lets just say its true carbon emissions cause global warming. lets just say.
There it is, "I don't know the details. But let me tell you about my kids again"
"We're the cleanest economy in the entire world." What the fuck does that mean?
No one’s answering the question.
"You said you wouldn't call me out on my bullshit!" - JD
Dude, you admit to lying about stuff.
now vance is trying to make it that its the democrats who don't believe in climate change. His argument is ridiculous given the signature ombudsman bill.
Why always do this crap, where they act like they're not going to let just babble at their leisure and then they just do it anyway.
I love vance pointing out that maybe they don't want to be with their baby after its born.