this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
399 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

31833 readers
183 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From the article:

Senior officials at the Home Office secretly lobbied the UK’s independent privacy regulator to act “favourably” towards a private firm keen to roll out controversial facial recognition technology across the country, according to internal government emails seen by the Observer.

Correspondence reveals that the Home Office wrote to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) warning that policing minister, Chris Philp, would “write to your commissioner” if the regulator’s investigation into Facewatch – whose facial recognition cameras have provoked huge opposition after being installed in shops – was not positive towards the firm.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“How to become a fascist, authoritarian shithole overnight: A United Kingdom story”

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate your profile picture. It's just flashing away on my screen while I look at comments.

You’re welcome

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 72 points 1 year ago

No, no, I can explain,

It's only bad when China does it.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The UK is starting to look a lot like they watched V for Vendetta and thought it was about a perfect government system, betrayed by some dirty hippies.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The UK has always had a stiffy for government surveillance.

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I've got no qualms with surveillance on government.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, so the Britain in V For Vendetta wasn't meant to be a model to build on and improve, you guys know that right?

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was inspired by Thatcher's Britain, which is what the current breed of British fascists are trying to recreate and "improve" on, so... yeah, they probably see Norsfire as a good inspiration for what they want to achieve. Sadly, wizard as he might claim to be, Moore's curses seem to be mostly ineffectual...

[–] Doric_loon@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

Follow the money I bet that there is an conservative MP that has shares in the company

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So... will this then be rolled back or...?

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

It's more like a tragedy.

[–] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Oswald Mosley would've loved being alive today

[–] squid@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jlow@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Senior officials at the Home Office secretly lobbied the UK’s independent privacy regulator to act “favourably” towards a private firm keen to roll out controversial facial recognition technology across the country, according to internal government emails seen by the Observer.

The heavily redacted correspondence also reveals that, even before the alleged threat, an internal February ICO briefing into its Facewatch investigation – codenamed Operation Kegon 3 – indicates that the Home Office had made it plain to the regulator that facial recognition to combat retail crime was being pushed aggressively by Philp.

“The Home Office have flagged that LFR [live facial recognition] in a commercial setting for crime detection/prevention purposes is an area that is high on the minister’s agenda,” states an executive summary of progress in the ICO investigation into Facewatch, weeks before it officially concluded.

The ICO concluded its investigation into Facewatch on 31 March – several weeks after the Home Office warning – with a blog explaining that no further regulatory action was required against the firm because it was “satisfied the company has a legitimate purpose for using people’s information for the detection and prevention of crime”.

“This disclosure is utterly damning and appears to show that Chris Philp intervened in the data regulator’s investigation of a private facial recognition company he was having meetings with,” said Mark Johnson, advocacy manager of Big Brother Watch.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “As the documents show, the minister made it clear that he was not seeking to influence any ICO investigation but to inform them of the government’s views about the seriousness of retail crime and abuse of staff.


The original article contains 990 words, the summary contains 271 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

[Chef's kiss!]