this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
148 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6598 readers
377 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which is only the second weirdest thing I saw soviet paratroopers doing.

[–] spechter@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm curious now, what was the weirdest thing?

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

During the Cold War soviets experimented with dropping soldiers from helicopters into snow. Without a rope or parachute. Just jump and pray. Went as smooth as you imagine. There is also that legend which almost certainly happened, but there aren’t any records of it. In one occasion during WW2 Russian paratroopers have been deployed from a plane from low altitude without parachutes. Again on snow. And only a third of them died.

Now, this has been denied by the soviets. But if we look at what else the Kremlin has said over the last century, we can safely assume that it absolutely happened.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Reminds me of the (probably apocryphal) story about the Ghurkas. They were told they'd be jumping behind Japanese lines, and they were a little apprehensive because they didn't think the ground would be soft enough. But when they were told they'd have parachutes they felt better.

[–] Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Hopefully we can develop some non credible footage of this event using a highly credible AI

[–] SamuraiBeandog@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You mean my clan in Battlefield 1942 wing riding on the Bomber to drop onto the far flag on Bocage was historically accurate?!

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Other than the war part of it, where do I sign up?!?!?!

Reminds me of a bi-plane jump I did at the World Freefall Convention in the mid-late '90s in Quincy, IL. Reach up, grab a bar attached to the wing, plane goes inverted, you hang from the wing and then let go. It was as cool AF as you might imagine. Second only to the Hot Air Balloon jump. The Jet was fun because it was a 727 but it felt like any other high and fast jump. But those two? Gold man.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Any pics or anything? Sounds nuts

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sadly not really. 1995 man, no digital cameras. I think I have one somewhere of me and my buddy in the jet, but it just looks like two dudes sitting ass to nuts on the floor of a plane with a bunch of other people hahah and one of me half dropping trow to show off my hip tattoo in tent city.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ah well. Not that I doubt you, just wondering if they still do that and what it looked like.

Keep on keeping on

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

That is kinda awesome?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That actually looks like a lot of fun

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If it's stupid and it works...

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Guess that depends on how you define "works". Russians do a lot of stuff that's stupid and "works" – see eg. the entire Ukrainian invasion.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

I mean, it hasn't worked yet, it just hasn't fully failed.