this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
66 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

58685 readers
4139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Subtracty@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Generative Ai is such a drain on our resources. While I am happy this is bringing about more green energy sources, watching it be poured into such meaningless bullshit is depressing.

[–] M600@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, AI models will improve and so will the hardware. Hopefully that means down the line, Ai will run on pretty conventional hardware and there will be an abundance of green energy.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Awfully optimistic of you.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be honest, I'm surprised Google/Alphabet hasn't tried to get into running their own reactor by this point. Energy seems like the one thing they haven't touched yet.

[–] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Probably because once you start a nuclear reactor you can't kill the project and discard it on a whim.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

That was a nasty line by you

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, that's their software side. Google doesn't do that with hardware infrastructure like data centers.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't they try to make their own ISP and then left it behind?

[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They didn't kill it where it was already running though.

Source: this comment posted through Google Fiber

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They Just stopped expanding then?

[–] Macallan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

No, they are still expanding. It's just happening really slowly. They are actively laying fiber and expanding in several cities in AZ right now.

A quick search will bring up cities they are planning on moving into.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, it was more expensive than anticipated to lay new fiber and then they had to fight entrenched monopolies in control of regulators at every turn.

[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

That's my understanding

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Microsoft:

Google: Hey! That is a great idea! Let me say publicly that I want to do the same