People Twitter

5392 readers

472 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1122

The value of x (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

138 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 3) 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Stomata@buddyverse.one 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I think 125

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

The angle formerly known as twitter

[–] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

~~125 = 180 - (180 - 90 - 35)~~

Edit: Never mind I saw the explanation for the correct answer below

[–] sag@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

40 + 60 + 35 Godamn It's kids math.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

Fidelity Values X Nearly 80% Less Than When Musk Bought It

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

Someone used “x” to mean the variable x on a podcast the other day and it made me wonder if Gen Z is happy to call eX-Twitter “X” and if they calls Tweets “posts”.

Annoying change for eX-Twitter

[–] Cock_Inspecting_Asexual@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Heheheh the 2 triangles are having segs

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

For the love of dog, you can't solve this problem without making assumptions that fundamentally change the answer. People are too quick to spot the first error and then make assumptions that are conveniently consistent with the correction.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments