People Twitter

5078 readers

2233 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying.
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1117

The value of x (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 week ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

143 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 3) 47 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Stomata@buddyverse.one 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think 125

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

The angle formerly known as twitter

[–] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~125 = 180 - (180 - 90 - 35)~~

Edit: Never mind I saw the explanation for the correct answer below

[–] sag@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

40 + 60 + 35 Godamn It's kids math.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Fidelity Values X Nearly 80% Less Than When Musk Bought It

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Someone used “x” to mean the variable x on a podcast the other day and it made me wonder if Gen Z is happy to call eX-Twitter “X” and if they calls Tweets “posts”.

Annoying change for eX-Twitter

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

For the love of dog, you can't solve this problem without making assumptions that fundamentally change the answer. People are too quick to spot the first error and then make assumptions that are conveniently consistent with the correction.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments