Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Yet voting for her may ensure the most anti-Palestinian outcome: A Trump presidency.
Hold ideals, but vote pragmatically.
Apparently, there are a lot of people that don't agree with you.
I wouldn’t know, my instance doesn’t do downvotes
I wasn't talking about downvotes, I was talking about the people voting for her.
Since many in this community have a habit of resorting to personal attacks when responding to posts recently, I'll say this: I support and respect everyone’s right to vote for who they want to.
I'm just posting this article that’s already available on a much bigger platform than Lemmy—I didn’t write it, just sharing it for discussion.
Pointing out how a moral stance leads to actual outcomes isn’t a personal attack. You're not a victim here.
Pointing out how a moral stance leads to actual outcomes isn’t a personal attack.
I never said it was. But calling me an idiot and a troll are personal attacks. I'm fine with people disagreeing. It's the name-calling that is out of line.
Pointing out how a moral stance leads to actual outcomes isn’t a personal attack.
She's irrelevant. The only thing to discuss is why she keeps trying to divide the left and not actually accomplish anything.
She’s irrelevant
Well she sure is making a lot of Lemmy users and democrats mad, so she must not be that irrelevant.
It's possible to be irrelevant and infuriating at the same time.
It’s possible to be irrelevant and infuriating at the same time.
But if she was so irrelevant, seems it would be tough to be infuriating. I mean, if she's irrelevant, then everyone could just ignore her. Right?
So you acknowledge that's what she does? Split the left?
I'm not acknowledging anything. I am saying she is making a lot of Lemmy users and democrats mad, so she must not be that irrelevant (which is what the poster said she was).