this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3971 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Republicans know they cannot go above 46-47% in popular vote, and cannot win what is essentially a two-person race with that support. A Republican nominee has received above 48% only once after 1988 (GW Bush in 2004). Only way to win the EC without PV win is for third party candidates to get support in key battleground states like Nader in 2000 and Johnson-Stein in 2016.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those of us that voted for Nader and Stein never would have voted for your shitty candidates. To begin with, your entire premise is based on the liberal 'spoiler vote' which is 100% myth. There could be zero third party candidates on the ballot and we still would not vote for a republican or a Democrat because we are not Republicans or Democrats.

The Blue fascists have done the same thing

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We get it, you are MAGA and want Donald in there.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Refer everyone back to where I said vote for Trump

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We are in the comments section of an article where Donald is hoping people will vote exactly as you do. So you're a MAGA. You are on here every day urging people to vote. Campaigning for Donald.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Poor attempt at a false dichotomy. and binary thinking

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not a false dichotomy, you don't understand what that term means. You're just literally urging for the same things as Donald does. That is because you are a MAGA.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

False dichotomy with 'you are either with us or against us.'

BlueMAGA are as clueless and uninformed as MAGA

[–] darharrison@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"BlueMAGA" is fascist astroturfing terminology.

You're a fascist.

You're not fooling anyone here.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

BlueMAGA is the reality of Democrats. They're just this batshit insane as MAGA Republicans.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

BlueMAGA isn't out supplanting reality... Well... for the MOST part they aren't supplanting reality. The worst they do is call Biden "the most consequential President ever!" which is patently false.

They aren't the ones claiming JFK and JFK Jr. are alive and coming back any day now, or that the Obamas and the Clintons are imprisoned in Guantanamo, or that Biden has been replaced with a lookalike which is an ENTIRELY different level of batshit crazy.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

You are trying to conflate MAGA and the QAnon freaks.