this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
-4 points (42.9% liked)

politics

19047 readers
4814 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Me - 10 hours ago:

https://lemmy.world/comment/12888518

"Next up: Joe Rogan interview."

Reuters - 2 hours ago.

😳

Guys, guys... it was a JOKE.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Stop. your jokes aren't funny when they become reality!

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Next up: Elon Musk interview streamed directly to Xitter

[–] marduk@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago

Manifest your dreams lol

[–] K7d@r.nf 2 points 1 day ago

Lmao you certainly do love patting yourself on the back, huh.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

I'd love to see them on hot ones.

That'd be a blast

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hey, she had a beer on air with Colbert...

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A much better idea would be Some More News, Good Work or Brian Taylor Cohen.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

For the record, BTC interviewed her some time back. I don't recall if it was during her run for President, though.

But right now, she seems to be (for some reason) trying to pull away some GOP votes. She's going on Fox News, and now Joe Rogan. Those viewers/listeners are typically deep into MAGA territory. I think this is a very bad idea for her that could backfire spectacularly, but it seems to be what she's going for. It sounds like she and/or her team have heard that her lead has all but evaporated, and she's getting desperate.

I don't think going into MAGA territory is going to help her situation -- there's zero chance that Fox News isn't going to take soundbytes from her interview and twist them out of proportion, for example -- but it's what she appears to be doing.

Reuters - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Reuters:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.reuters.com/world/us/kamala-harris-could-join-podcaster-joe-rogan-an-interview-sources-2024-10-15/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support