this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
243 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19091 readers
3802 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 45 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

if punishment isnt jailtime, or a % of income then this is just the cost of doing business

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

His income is a complicated web of assets. They'd probably argue he only makes 100k a year.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

Fine, let's just do 20% of net worth.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The organisation can be declared illegal and its assets seized.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In the old days the mob would have broke musk's legs over this

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would happily vote for the mob over Trump. Any chance that’s still an option?

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Trump acts like the Mob. You do this one thing for me and you'll benifit in my organization and owe me, you know quid pro quo. Only the people who think they're benifiting will follow him, even though they're getting screwed. At least the Mob has its rules.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, except I think the mob is/was more trustworthy, better organized, and more qualified for their jobs…probably better food too. Then again, I’m basing pretty much all my knowledge on The Sopranos.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The civil suit, which names Mr. Musk and America PAC as defendants, requests that a state court halt further operation of the sweepstakes in Pennsylvania.

The suit also accuses Mr. Musk and America PAC of violating state consumer protection laws by deploying deceptive or misleading statements. As one example, Mr. Krasner argues that winners are not, in fact, random because “multiple winners that have been selected are individuals who have shown up at Trump rallies in Pennsylvania.”

So just to be clear, this is not criminal charges. This is a civil suit seeking an injunction, and possibly damages (the latter not clear from the article).

It makes sense, I suppose, since a criminal investigation may take more time, but disappointing nonetheless. I predict Musk will continue to do this until he's arrested, deported or the election is over. Criminal charges may or may not follow, but probably won't happen before the election.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Best case scenario, there is an injunction now, a civil suit that brings evidence out into the open during discovery, and criminal charges at both the state and federal level once they have an overwhelming case built up that can eviscerate any defense his army of lawyers might put forward.

I wish they could just slap cuffs on him now and toss him in jail, but unfortunately the richest man in the world is not going to be easy to prosecute.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 15 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you, DA Krasner. Obviously the Fed DOJ is too concerned about being political to actually do their JOB!!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck yes, Krasner. At least somebody is doing something.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago

The New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The New York Times:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New York Times is generally reliable. WP:RSOPINION should be used to evaluate opinion columns, while WP:NEWSBLOG should be used for the blogs on The New York Times's website. The 2018 RfC cites WP:MEDPOP to establish that popular press sources such as The New York Times should generally not be used to support medical claims.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/28/us/politics/elon-musk-giveaway-philadelphia-lawsuit.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Vk4.fx-G.laOgVu_J2YhH
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support