this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
157 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
690 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lacabraenlamachina@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Good. You're not supposed to go to Facebook to be informed.

[–] habanhero@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do you mean? The same people who get "news" from Facebook will still get "news" from Facebook. It will just no longer involve any actual media companies. Think blogger, pseudo-news and AI generated content - fake news gonna fake.

[–] tarsn@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Also American news

[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And they'll have to go to actual sources to fact check.

[–] subignition@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Bold of you to assume that fact checking is even in the repertoire of the chud brained

[–] habanhero@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

My point is with this legislation we effectively removed news outlets from the "source pool", and all the remaining sources you can rely on Facebook is the questionable ones.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What did I do now? Does McDonald's have news I can read?

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

They sure do. Did you know there will be new toys in the happy meal soon?

[–] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's right, you're supposed to go down to the local coffee shop to find out what is going on.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

For those not reading the article: the law isn't prohibiting Facebook from letting users share news content. Rather, it's requiring Facebook to pay Canadian publishers before letting users share their news content. The amount to be paid is to be determined through government-meditated negotiations with the publishers. Facebook has chosen not to participate in this and therefore it will stop letting users share news articles at all.

(Why Facebook won't be letting Canadian users share articles published in other countries is not clear to me.)

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

(Why Facebook won’t be letting Canadian users share articles published in other countries is not clear to me.)

Two reasons come to mind

  1. (relative good faithed) Prevent accidentally breaking the rules, having canadian content on international outlets etc ect
  2. (bad faith) Actively overreact and punish users for the government decision to force them to backpaddle on the whole thing
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It might have to do with using VPNs.

[–] Bleach7297@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

I lobbied hard for c-18. For those who were getting their news from Facebook, you're free now. You can either put an ounce of effort into informing yourself and be ten times harder to program, or let an American megacorp continue to spoon feed you reality, but understand that the quality of your sources just went down the shitter

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

The Zuck in shambles lol

[–] UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

if you get your news from facebook... nuff said

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

sooo, just archive.is links?

But muh research..!

[–] susquatch@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When does bill c-18 come into effect?

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/news/2023/07/the-online-news-act-next-steps.html

Obligations under the Online News Act will come into effect no later than 180 days after June 22, 2023, the day Bill C-18 received Royal Assent. When elements of the Act come into effect will depend on regulations from the Governor in Council (GIC), and the implementation of processes by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC).

[–] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Can we have this on America too?

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Has anyone tried googling news lately? You won't find any Canadian news. I don't really know how to search across all the sites without google.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The hardest part is finding good sources, leaning slightly on either sides of the political spectrum. Then once you have that, I check if they have an RSS feed, and add that into an RSS reader. There are RSS reader apps that are running entirely locally (but must be left running to periodically gather new entries) and there are cloud-based RSS reader that will collect them for you, and keep your reading history in sync, etc.

Once you get that, you can see all the article's titles, sorted the way you want without having an algorithm showing you what it thinks might generate clicks.

[–] CaptainFlintlockFinn@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I fancy myself fairly tech savvy. I managed to figure out this Lemmy thing, lol.

For whatever reason I’ve never really understood how an RSS thing works. I guess I’ve just never been compelled to figure it out.

My main point is that the kinds of people who were/are getting all their news from Meta probably couldn’t figure out RSS either.

Seems like a good idea though. I might have to finally dig in to it.

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

An RSS feed is like having someone email you a link everytime they publish something. So you can have a bunch of news outlets all in the same feed (or inbox in the analogy) and have one place for all the content.

I used to use them for research papers. Everytime a paper was published by a journal I had selected, it showed up in the feed.

[–] kfet@fosstodon.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@MacroCyclo @mp3 May I recommend https://duckduckgo.com

There's a choice of many other alternative search engines too, all with their own benefits, and all serving great search results. DDG is good if you care about privacy.

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, looks like duckduckgo still has news!

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Try andisearch.com, I've had good results with it so far.

[–] ashtrix@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Umm.. thanks? lol

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So I'm a little confused. I just logged into facebook for the first time in a long while and posted a cbc article and it worked fine. So is it rolling out or what? I went on NPRs facebook page and could see articles from them too.

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How will this affect Lemmy.ca?

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So far C-18 only targets Google and Facebook, but I wouldn't be surprised if it expands to other large commercial social media platforms.

I doubt it would impact the Fediverse, since at the moment the platform isn't generating any revenue from the content through ads or clicks.

[–] nathris@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of our senators mentioned that the threshold was set so that it only affects Google and Meta. Microsoft can share news stories without paying because Bing isn't as popular.

That same senator also said that more people should start using Bingβ„’, and that it's actually a really good search engine. Not even joking. The article read like a sponsored post.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

The senator saying people should use Bing was one of the most sensible reactions I've seen to Meta and Google pulling news from their sites in Canada. Reminding people there are alternatives to Google seems like a better way of handling this than trying to convince Google to reverse their decision.

[–] throwsbooks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Makes me think about how the BBC started a mastodon instance. If the CBC follows their example, then federation changes the relationship with social media, as it's sort of baked in...?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

It wouldn't. At least not until Lemmy.ca grows to the point where it wields a Facebook-like power in the Canadian media landscape and makes profit out of it.

[–] Woofcat@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Personally I find this hilarious. The argument that Meta (Facebook) and Google are making "so much money" from Canadian News is in itself laughable. If anything they're helping keep Canadian News relevant by suggesting it to people. No-one forced CBC to go make an instagram account etc.

So I think the law is working great. They demanded if you're going to link to a website you have to pay them a share of the revenue you generate. So these companies have elected that it's not worth the cost and will not link to them. Seemingly the media is going full shocked pikachu over this.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO the Federal Goverment went too soft. They should have made a broader law under the form of a tax, where all social medias companies are required to pay a tax to operate in Canada and properly fund journalism, no matter if they display Canadian news or not.

Don't wanna pay? Then no operation in Canada at all.

[–] Woofcat@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does social media have to fund journalism... they pay taxes here.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not enough if you ask me.

Their incentives is to drive clicks and ad views, while cannibalizing the content producers from their traffic.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think you've done the critical legwork to evaluate this argument. This looks like a surface level assesment. It's been discussed in more depth in previous threads on the topic.

[–] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

You can always get your news from the news sites like before facebook existed.... I fail to see the problem.

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

What does this mean? If I lost a link to a BBC article, it'll get deleted?

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

They never could

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί