this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
1236 points (99.3% liked)

News

23644 readers
4536 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 400 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Country wide outage at the corruption involved with the health insurance

Health insurance industry: we can make it worse

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

outrage*

Also, not an insurance company. He worked for Pfizer.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pfizer is a med company. They negotiate with insurance. They work together to fuck us over.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It's a pharmaceutical company. They're no saints, but it's disingenuous to compare them to people who take money and provide nothing but a rubber stamp.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Did everyone forget about scumbag Martin Shkreli who raised medication prices for no reason other than he wanted more money?

"In September 2015, Shkreli was widely criticized when Turing obtained the manufacturing license for the antiparasitic drug Daraprim and raised its price to insurance companies from $13.50 to $750.00 (USD) per pill."

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 250 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're certainly not being subtle with the class warfare

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 171 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A certain fair and unbiased trial he's getting..../s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] giacomo@lemm.ee 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"conflict of interest" was old speak from the dark ages.

[–] ovalofsand@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We are in the second Gilded Age

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

You're a pure soul... but you didn't say "God bless you" when I sneezed.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 103 points 1 day ago

This is the sort of thing judges are supposed to recuse themselves over.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 110 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Surely she’ll do the right thing and recuse herself from the case.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 day ago

She won't, and don't call her Shirley!

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would think it might be excusable if this were a straight-up murder charge, which is mostly facts and evidence based. However, if they're charging him with terrorism, which is much more subjective, doesn't that make this a serious conflict of interest?

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

No. It's inexcusable. Even if he pooped on her lawn she should have no right to be legally judging him.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago

Can't help but be biased here. The facts fit too well. Remember, bias has to do with the perception of poor judgment. We don't need to gamble on it.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't seem like a conflict of interest /s

No such things. These are professional/s.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’m going to nitpick here. The main reference for this Yahoo/daily Beast article is OP. That’s not corroborating.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Honestly the data in the article is the reference so yeah

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 day ago

Once against proving we have a two tiered justice system.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

Yikes. Incredibly messed up.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Definitely good reason to get them swapped out for a different judge but are they going to oversee the whole trial or just the pretrial?

Also, they were an executive at Pfizer, not an insurance firm.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pfizer isn't exactly in the good graces of the public either.

For profit healthcare is the problem. It's not the doctors, or nurses, or phlebotomists, or pharmacists that are trying to save lives. It's the people who handle the money fucking around with people's lives so they can make more.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Right now it's the largest pharmaceutical company in the USA maybe on earth, so definitely can't be morally upright. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's the magistrate judge doing the pretrial hearings, not the trial judge. Not great, but not quite as outrageous.

[–] ellen_musk_0x@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Just leaving this link here for no particular reason:

https://youtu.be/uqH_Y1TupoQ

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This motherfucker was chosen specifically because of his racist and homophobic bias. Endorsing him is endorsing his prejudices.

Go on, you pieces or shit. Defend this horrifying bastard. It just places you on the same disgusting level as him.

[–] Devdoggy@lemm.ee 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Give them a break. They only saw the headline and the picture of a man before commenting.

[–] Devdoggy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

I did. I saw that they hadn't read the article and simply corrected them.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›