From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
Hello! I have a 215Gb fat32 partition on my external SSD, and a 100Gb unallocated space right next to it, and I's like to extend it to 315Gb. So, on KDE partition manager, I right-click on the fat32 partition, select "resize/move", and this is the windows that pops up:
as you can see, the textbox with the size is grayed out, so I can only move the partition, but not resize it. Why? the device is not mounted of course, and I can operate on other partitions without problems.
thanks in advance!
You can only extend at the end. You would need to move it first.
but why isn't it giving me the possibility to extend it to the right by 4.01 Mb then?
4.01Mb may be too small for a single block.
I don't have a FAT32 partition available at hand to test this out, but couldn't you first move the partition to the left, and then extend it? Because IIRC FAT in general whines if you change its starting point, so you need to actually tell it "move yourself, you fat32ass!".
Also note that, for most purposes, you'd be better off with NTFS than FAT32.
thanks for the reply! I'll try to move it then. But without moving it, shouldn't I be able to extend it right by 4.01Mb?
IIRC FAT in general whines if you change its starting point, so you need to actually tell it “move yourself, you fat32ass!”
XD
Also note that, for most purposes, you’d be better off with NTFS than FAT32.
Why this? isn't NTFS primary a windows partition type?
Why this? isn’t NTFS primary a windows partition type?
Because FAT32 has a 4GB file size limit, it's generally slower, and it's easier for hardware faults to corrupt files in a FAT32 filesystem.
Usually I wouldn't bother with FAT32 unless some device specifically requires it, but this is uncommon nowadays. (Be sure to check it out first though, just in case, before ever thinking about changing filesystems!) And nowadays, even if NTFS was originally a Windows partition type (and FAT32 a DOS/W9x one), Linux has excellent support for both, both writing and accessing.
But without moving it, shouldn’t I be able to extend it right by 4.01Mb?
It's probably aligning the round edge to the hardware. Odds are that you can turn this off (in gparted you can), check if there isn't something about this in "Advanced >>".
Either way, I wouldn't worry too much. It's just 4MB.
thanks! What about exfat?
I don't know much about exFAT, besides the fact that it's encumbered by Microsoft patents.
I believe Microsoft published the spec and opened up the patents for exfat a while ago. So Linux has had a pretty good exfat driver from Samsung since Kernel 5.7.
Thanks for the info - as I mentioned, I don't know much about it. And frankly I never saw a point on using it, I usually go with ext4 > NTFS > FAT32.
I have an mid 2000's car stereo with USB support that only supports fat32
Cases like this are why I told OP to check it out first, just in case. Or why I said that devices requiring it are uncommon, not non-existent.
isn’t NTFS primary a windows partition type?
So is FAT32. Only FAT32 is more primitive and its origins trace back to a time long before Windows when DOS was still the primary MS OS.