taladar

joined 2 years ago
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

There are plenty of tasks which they solve perfectly, today.

Name a single task you would trust an LLM on solving for you that you feel confident would be correct without checking the output. Because that is my definition of perfectly and AI falls very, very far short of that.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are some numbers in this blog post https://www.wheresyoured.at/openai-is-a-systemic-risk-to-the-tech-industry-2/ (and a couple of others on the same blog) and they really don't look like OpenAI is going to last a couple of years until profitability.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

The difficult question about AGI destroying humanity is deciding whether to be afraid of that option or to cheer it on and LLM enthusiasts are certainly among the people heavily pushing me towards the 'cheer it on' option.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 month ago (11 children)

As a standalone thing, LLMs are awesome.

They really aren't though and that is half the problem. Everyone pretends they are awesome when the results are unusable garbage 80% of the time which makes them unusable for 99% of practical applications.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The difference between AI companies and most other tech companies is that AI companies have significant expenses that scale with the number of customers.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

You think someone just got confused between the ugly guy, the tower and the top position and that is how we ended up in this mess?

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

It goes so far that a lot of the very same people vilifying open relationships are the ones cheating on their partners.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

On the other hand that is also one of those things that annoys me about romance culture, the whole notion of your girlfriend/boyfriend/wife/husband being "stolen" by someone else as if your partner was just a passive object instead of being the actual person in the cheating who made promises to you (which might or might not include sexual exclusivity depending on mutually agreed upon preferences between everyone in the relationship) and should keep those promises or break up with you no matter what any third person tempts them with.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is really not a big change to the way we work unless you work in a language that has very low expressiveness like Java or Go and we have been able to generate the boilerplate in those automatically for decades.

The main problem is that it is really not at all useful or produces genuinely beneficial results and yet everyone keeps telling us they do but can not point to a single GitHub PR or similar source as an example for a good piece of code created by AI without heavy manual post-processing. It also completely ignores that reading and fixing other people's (or worse, AI's) code is orders of magnitude harder than writing the same code yourself.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Probably not going to go belly-up, in a while

Don't be so sure about that, the numbers look incredibly bad for them in terms of money burned per actual revenue, never mind profit. They can't even pay for the inference alone (never mind training, staff, rent,...) from the subscriptions.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In fact Daggerfall was almost nothing but quests and other content like that.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

So they stole all the cookies a single news website set in the browser of one user?

 

After adding some lines today to log some information I had missed that was vital for debugging I was wondering if there were any automated tools like linters or similar static analysis tools that help you identity the information to log and or return in error cases.

I am specifically talking about the information that should be identifiable automatically because it contributes to the control flow arriving in the current scope such as values of variables in the condition for the scope or parameters of functions that calculate those values (e.g. the file name in a permission error, the value of a variable that failed an if let or let else pattern match,...

 

It seems to me the basic ActivityPub specification is written from the perspective of Mastodon and Twitter-like fediverse instances.

I assume Lemmy and kbin did extend this with some more objects or at least agreed how to use the existing objects and activities there to model a link aggregator with comments on top of that.

Is there some sort of specification or design document about this somewhere? All I found when googling were some old links that resulted in a 404 and the current Lemmy documentation seems more focussed on users, admins and developers and less on the protocol side of things.

 

This community is meant to be about any content and discussions related to the Second Life virtual world / metaverse. It is both for current SL residents and people curious about Second Life who have questions or need help getting started.

Second Life

!second_life@sh.itjust.works

https://sh.itjust.works/c/second_life

view more: next ›