this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
1255 points (98.2% liked)

Greentext

4625 readers
2075 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 242 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Anon got it backwards, networks noticed how profitable Netflix was and bumped the price for Netflix to stream their stuff. Netflix responded by producing their own content rather than leasing others’ at exorbitant rates. Then Netflix later got greedy and bumped their prices, lowered their quality, and cancelled all of their good shows.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 78 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I think it's a bit of both. Netflix knew that companies choosing to pull their content would be a threat, so they prematurely started producing content (famously starting with House of Cards and Orange is the New Black). Whether because they saw this as a threat or because of the perceived greater profitability of their own platforms (probably a bit of both), other studios started pulling their content from Netflix and setting up their own streaming sites.

And naturally, other companies pulling their content accelerated Netflix's desire to produce their own content to ensure they weren't left in the lurch.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 22 hours ago

Yeah I consulted for the cable industry around the time that everyone was just starting to try to build their own services to compete with Netflix. It wasn't a secret that production companies would be pulling their content. There were licensing agreements signed that had expiration dates.

So it was more like a race on both ends. Production companies were like "we get exclusive streaming rights to our movies back in X months, so we need to have our own platform up and running." And Netflix was like "we lose streaming rights to these movies in X months, we need to make some content to replace it with."

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yall are overcomplicating things. Let me simplify.

Capitalist corporations + infinite greed = cannibalism

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's remarkable how people can see right past what was actually happening and only see what they want to see. Netflix was never trying to be the good guy. Netflix didn't offer low prices out of the goodness of it's hearts. It doesn't have a heart, it has a ledger. The reason why Netflix offered a lot of content for a low price is because the company was trying to disrupt traditional cable. It was always the plan to increase prices, Netflix didn't become greedy, it always was. It's just that for a time the companies greed aligned with the publics greed. Once that relationship was no longer beneficial to Netflix it raised the prices, that was the plan all along.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

But that's a zero sum argument. Every company is evil following that logic. No company does anything except for money.

You can make that argument, but it isn't unique to Netflix.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago

I feel bad for the artists.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Literally the only thing missing is full migration to H265 or AV1 with a solid bitrate.

It's still a bit inconsistent due to hardware acceleration capabilities and final file size targets.

Most torrents are too compressed or too huge.

Luckily bandwidth and storage is cheaper than ever, so going for full size quality rips is viable for many.

[–] CoopaLoopa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Once Intel ARC cards are supported natively in UnRaid, I'll be transcoding everything to AV1.

Hardware encoding for AV1 is really all that has been missing for it to be widely used for homelab setups.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Solid bitrate? I used 400 kb/s AV1 constant bitrate for HD anime, 750 for HD realfilm, results in 300 MB and 500 MB files for 2 hours video, no artifacts. Why does Handbrake default to 6000 kb/s?

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 12 points 23 hours ago (12 children)

I want to watch Dark Matter without a million popups, malware or shady "trust me bro" programs.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

FMHY (Free Media Heck Yeah) has a pretty solid guide for beginners on how to find most forms of media safely.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Godort@lemm.ee 83 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Try the 70s.

That was when VHS and cassette tapes started to hit the market and there was no copy protection on those. Following that, people copied floppy disks enough that they had to make that "dont copy that floppy" jingle.

There was a brief period with the switch to digital and CDROMs where piracy stopped, but then CD burners hit the market and it started again.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It turns out in every era, copyright is a sham. Information in its natural state is free - our legal system tries to change that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 61 points 1 day ago (4 children)

everyone is forced to pay for media

Anon never copy vhs, cassette tape, cd, and dvd. I lived in southeast asia and pirated cd/dvd is openly sold in night market and low foot traffic part of the mall throughout the late 90s till early 2010s, only occasionally they got raid. Before that we basically record show from cable and rental then copy for each others.

But yes, as GabeN proved again and again, piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem. Almost.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 67 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

2007? Anon is a sweet summer child.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago (5 children)

OP forgot Napster, as well as the p2p networks of old like WinMX, Kazaa, etc, nevermind Usenet.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You pirate because prices are too high

I pirate because I have kleptomania

We are not the same

[–] introvertcatto@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But piracy is not theft, it's copyright infringement.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›