this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
66 points (94.6% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

1 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Non paywalled link: https://archive.ph/IKzXb

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Javish@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don’t think I’m gonna like this.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Feels like the beginning of the end, doesn't it. Interesting original content will have to give way for commercial mainstream appeal.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 years ago

It feels like A24 is deploying the same singles and doubles strategy that Eisner is deploying when he took over Disney.

Small movies can take creative risks, but they are at the size where their movies can start to compete beyond art house theaters.

[–] Javish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This feels like a continuation of the enshitification of everything lately.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This word is losing more and more meaning with every passing day.

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

Or maybe it's just becoming more and more prevalent.

[–] rephlekt2718@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago

Fuck. I mean, let’s wait and see, but def doesn’t sound good from here.

[–] realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not sure how I feel about this. But I think we'd be mistaken if we assume that A24 movies are so good just because they're arthouse films.

[–] eutsgueden@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Of course, arthouse does not automatically equal good. They're good movies because they're good ideas from people with a vision, and A24 gave these people funding and a platform for their vision, (seemingly) without asking them to make compromises for the sake of profit. This new strategy could take that away.

People will always find ways to make their arthouse movies. The difference is A24 made them easy to find and arguably popular.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago
[–] bakachu@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

So it sounds like this is a profit-driven decision with auteur dramas in general just not being as profitable as action films or films that have some element of action.

Kind of a radical idea, but I always wondered if the movie industry would do better with different pricing models. When people go to the movies nowadays it seems like its just a better deal over all to see something big budget (even though it may not be an especially good storyline). So maybe just so we can get more variety out of it, they price accordingly and see how the market reacts?

[–] doom_and_gloom@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Who can blame a sell-out, right?

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

On one hand, I'm a little sad, on the other hand, I'm interested if they do it differently. Time will tell.

[–] ExcursionInversion@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Makes sense, have to fund it somehow.