this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
515 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

60942 readers
5638 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 126 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Does this mean league of legends is a weapon

[–] Gloria@sh.itjust.works 76 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Weapon of Mass Distraction.

[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 2 weeks ago

Psychological Warfare for sure

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 54 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

I mean it installs a rootkit on your computer that gives them full control over everything including what you type, hear, and see as well as the ability to record what you've previously typed and said. It could at any moment also fully disable your computer (as well as millions of other computers) rendering them useless.

Just because they haven't used it that way, don't assume they can't or won't.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, there's always been speculation that Vanguard is spyware. There's absolutely no need or justification for always-on cheat detection.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What speculation? It’s literally spyware. You are giving it full low level access to your processor.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Don't get me wrong, Vanguard is BS, and I quit playing riot games because of it. However, simply having low level access isn't sufficient to classify it as spyware, otherwise drivers would be spyware. I still haven't seen any evidence that it currently does anything nefarious with that access, which means it's quite unlikely it's being used for mass surveillance.

To me, there are 2 problems: 1) It could be used for targeted attacks, and the likelihood anyone would find out is much lower than in a widespread surveillance scenario. 2) It could be used to deploy a massive bot-net.

I think the US reclassification here is precautionary in nature.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Exactly. I avoid kernel-level anti-cheat not because of any known spying they do (and honestly, anything w/ user-level privileges can read all your personal data), but that they add yet another attack vector for a bad actor. I highly doubt Vanguard gets as much security scrutiny as drivers, for example.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Except drivers are designed to interact with hardware and to make it usable, kernel-level anticheats are designed to specifically scan/block/etc software. They are pretty different with their intended purposes, even though they offer the same/similar invasiveness.

[–] CaptKoala@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

A weapon against sanity, yes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Gosh I feel like I've heard Tencent has a stake in some other company that isn't mentioned here yet.

what was it . . . hmmmmm

[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm really not sure which one you mean, because they own interest in a ton of companies.

[–] WhoLooksHere@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tik Tok is what they're referring to

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 58 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] WhoLooksHere@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tik Tok is the only tencent company I know if that's been labeled a national security risk.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (11 children)

They also have a stake in all these companies...

Legaue of legends

Epic games

Ubisoft

From soft

Activision blizzard

WeChat

[–] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Funcom (Conan games and an upcoming Dune game) and Grinding Gear Games (Path of Exile) as well.

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Wtf they own 100% shares of GGG? https://app.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/app/ui/pages/companies/1887410/shareholdings

Well idk about supporting POE2 now. Or should I not care?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dlayknee@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Activision Blizzard

I think the MSFT buyout eliminated their stake in ABK?

Fromsoft is unfortunate, but I honestly don't use any of the rest.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 53 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

They gonna force a sale of League of Legends now?

Do Fortnite next.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Tencent owns 11% of Reddit...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Calling Tencent a "web and gaming giant" is really deceiving here.

It's one of the biggest tech conglomerates in the world. Tencent invest into literally everything: games, social networks, entertainments, cloud computing, finance, AI, other investments... Tencent owns WeChat, Tencent Cloud, Tencent Healthcare just to name a few and helps CCP with surveilance and censorship through these ownings (tbf they don't really have a choice, they're based in China)

100% they are involved in military too so this classification is very much justified.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't they also have lots of stakes in other companies.

[–] gingernate@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah that's what the comment said

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why is the list not just every Chinese company? do they not know how state capitalism works?

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah they do. Fascism is state capitalism. They plan to replicate China.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (43 children)

We have a puppet coming into the presidency. China will have all the inroads to our government they care to pay for. Tencent and Co. will be a non-issue.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A US social media giant owns the president. I don't think there going to allow the competition. Muskrat and Fuckerburg have a lot more sway and money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 22 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Can't win capitalism? Fret not, everything is national security and we can throw the rules of capitalism out the window :)

And then the west is surprised at the confused look of the global south when Ursula and Biden mention "Rules based order"...

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean it's not like China was open and allowed competition from western companies.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But it us kind of insulting when America did incredible violence to the global south to get them to open their markets only throw it all out the window.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

China is state capitalism. Capitalism isn't losing. The West is losing because China is using state funds to buy up successful Western companies, and as their new owner, has the ability to force them to do China's bidding.

Meanwhile the West is completely barred from buying a majority stake in any successful Chinese company and even if it could would not be taking it over on behalf of serving the state.

The problem is China plays by its own rules and those rules are heavily stacked against every other nation. That was fine when they were making junk for Walmart; it's not so fine when it's highly sophisticated electronics and software (that can do whatever China wants it to in the West) ... and to add insult to injury it's often based on stolen Western technology (since us idiots decided to put the factories that manufacturer the designs there).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

That's horrible. I should Google for more information so I can avoid using companies involved with the military.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I wonder what this means for 50 Cent?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Would Call of Duty be the American equivalent?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›