this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
183 points (97.4% liked)

Linux

48693 readers
1583 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey fellow Linux enthusiasts! I'm curious to know if any of you use a less popular, obscure or exotic Linux distribution. What motivated you to choose that distribution over the more mainstream ones? I'd love to hear about your experiences and any unique features or benefits that drew you to your chosen distribution.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 257m@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Not my daily but I carry around a usb with slax linux as a portable work environment as well as a recovery tool.

[–] superguy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Manjaro.

It does what I need it to in a way that is convenient and accessible to me.

I agree with pretty much all of their design decisions and am just looking for a preconfigured Arch.

Been running it exclusively for the past 3 years and have no inclination on switching.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Manjaro.

I wanted a rolling distro that had up to date software because I got tired of Ubuntu's 6 month upgrade cycle. But I also didn't want to deal with source packages because I value my time.

Don't get me wrong, I still use Xubuntu, CentOS and RHEL at work, but for my home system I want something that does not give me any major problems so I can unwind after work.

I know about the issues with the site certificates and sometimes the package certificates. He who never messed up big time can cast the first stone.

Manjaro has been on my games machine for nearly 3 years and it has been a smooth experience.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 year ago

Today im an Arch user, however in the past i was a Big Linux user. Even more in the past, i was user of Kurumin Linux

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

I'm on Garuda, primarily becausei built a new machine with a (then) bleeding edge GPU, so I needed something rolling release that could make use of it. I tried a few others, including Endeavour and Nobara, but Garuda got me farthest along on its own.

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My fav obscure distros are: 1. Sparky Linux, Debian based simple stable system. It has many flavours with a lot of desktops to choose from. Also has stable and semi-roling iso. Now I never installed Debian itself, so can't compare sparky with Debian. But it is very much better than any other distro I used. I don't know why it is not popular. 2. Reborn OS. I used to love it when running. Arch based lovely project. This is the very much successor of Antergos.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gnuplusmatt@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Don't know if this counts - used Fedora KDE for about a decade and then last year moved to Fedora Kinoite. It's essentially the same, but is OSTree based and immutable. I like the solid base, the rebasing function and containers

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I guess SteamOS? It's immutable and... well runs on the SteamDeck which is pretty cool. I use it to play, obviously, but also to work. Love it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I used to be a huge fan of Crunchbang Linux for the minimalism

[–] Roshakk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Artix, YouTube "influences". Still maybe will transfer over to mainline Arch to avoid having to go crazy anytime something requires systemd

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I use MX, formerly know as Mepis. Super stable and kept up to date. It used to be Debian based and they still use some Debian repos but it's largely independent now

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Back in the day I used some smaller distros. Sabayon and Archbang both come to mind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RTRedreovic@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago

Artix Linux (w/ Runit) & Void Linux. Interestingly although I started using Linux from Jan 2022, I have used these 2 distros 95% of that time. The rest 5% being Endeavour OS on which I started my journey into Linux.

Due to older hardware and my natural curiousity to learn more about the System. I switched to Artix very early into Linux. The Runit Init system and the fact I chose a base iso (i.e. everything in the system apart from the Core was hand picked and configured by me) made my PC very fast and flexible. I found it quite inconvenient to work and learn w/ and in EndeavourOS. Artix provided me that canvas and it helped me a lot. One possible future con might be that I find it a bit more effort to troubleshoot more popular Distros, in case I need to, because I rarely use non-tui or non-cli programs and I have never worked on Systemd. Fortunately there are always the Arch Wiki or the Program Manuals.

I switched to Void Linux from Artix because Artx, being Arch-Based was a bit unstable whereas Void is a stable-rolling release, sort of like a middle ground between Debian and Arch and so it fits my dynamic. Otherwise it is as good as Artix in other cases.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›