A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
Personally, I don't mind when ads are reasonable for a website or service I'm getting for free. I think people should get paid for the service they are providing. The problem is it always eventually gets out of control and at that point, yeah I'm going to block your ads.
I was on a website earlier today and 80% of the screen was ads. Sorry, you're getting added to my block list.
Just never go to a website like that again if you have the choice. Seeing a drop in visitors and ad revenue after making the decision to pepper the entire screen with ads is the only thing that will cause the webmaster to reverse that decision.
webmaster
Now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time.. a long time
Nowadays we call him spider-man
Same.
I've paid $10 for spotify every month for years and it's always been a great service and the algorithm does a good job of finding me new music that I like.
But most of this stuff can be pirated or bought piecemeal without bothering with a subscription.
And that's what we'll do when it gets out of hand, as we all know it will.
Louis Rossmann: "when the pirate experience is better than the paid experience, you have a problem."
Alternatively a Gabe Newell quote: "Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem." Not exactly the same context but it also applies.
YouTube started nearly (or completely?) ad-free and stayed that way till all of their competition was dead, people were addicted to it and there was no alternative. Then they started turning up the ad knob - gradually to avoid people leaving for something newer, until it was so obnoxious that ad blockers became common among even nontechnical users. Now they're gas lighting ad block users as if they are committing a crime.
YouTube wouldn't be in a position to make these unfair demands if they didn't use their enormous wealth to create a video hosting monopoly and subjecting their users to bait and switch. F*** Google and their pretend morality. F*** them for destroying the web experience. F*** them for destroying web access and livelihood for many by banning their accounts and neglecting all appeals. I'm sure not going to create revenue for a very abusive, unethical and evil corporation.
If content creators want to get paid, start a patreon account or something. Or join a paid subscription service like nebula. I'm open to all those. I just don't want a disgusting leech in between.
I'd be fine with ads, but Google's policy is only superficially about ads. They want surveillance and user profiling, not ads. Ads are just a way to deliver these. Over my dead body.
I know I can't escape Google's Orwellian surveillance entirely but I limit what I can, and adblockers/ trackerblockrers play a huge part in this.
Even ignoring the surveillance aspect of ads, which I could go on a massive rant about, Google and other ad platforms themselves doesn't seem to care about harming people with malvertising and scam ads. Why should I care about their revenue?
I maintain that when YouTube goes away there won't be a free alternative of the same scale that replaces it
Thank God
Pornhub could start Videohub tomorrow and shake things up if they really wanted to.
Otherwise there's Odysee (bad name, linked to crypto but good interface) and Peertube (federated but searches aren't* so it will never catch on), but people aren't too fond of those.
* I know about Sepia Search. People shouldn't have to use yet another website to find the videos they want on Peertube. It's stupid.
Pornhub could do that, but there's a reason they haven't. Video delivery is insanely complex and expensive and consumer tolerance for advertising on those platforms is low. With no other way to sustain and income from it the only option will be loads of smaller sites or a paid site.
Probably, no other website will be able to capitalize on the early internet and a lack of good video sites.
YouTube isn't "going away". What could happen is a lot of people switch to something better.
Just like a whole bunch of people have switched to Lemmy, which is better than Reddit. YouTube would still exist, at least for a while, just like Reddit still exists.
Everything goes away eventually. If YouTube stops being valuable to Google, it's going away.
Yeah, sites like peertube will never catch on besides any small techy circles. Any alternative will have to be centralized, that's the only way they'll get ad companies to their platform. Without ad companies, creators will have to revenue and no incentive to keep making videos on that platform.
I'm sure other people don't mind ads. Yeah fuck that, I'm gonna ad block till the day I die.
Which is a fine take to have. I block all ads almost all the time. But web hosting does cost money. So I see enabling ads on those who asked nicely has been what I see is donating my time and my annoyance with ad to a service that I value and should donate to. I have been burned a couple of times. But I still do it because hosting content on we costs money.
well I hope there's more people like you to counteract me, cuz I never do that lol
You're a criminal! Nice customer relations there.
I mean, if a service is free... You're the product, you've never been the customer 🙃
I was a premium subscriber for a long time, and probably still would be if Google hadn't turned so evil that I can no longer in good conscience pay them any money.
But what pushed me over the edge with an ad blocker was a page I got to where every paragraph had a video ad in between. That was it.