NBA - Main

29 readers

3 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

communick@nba.space

rglullis

If you replaced Jamal Murray with Trae Young would the Nuggets be better or worse? (alien.top)

submitted 2 years ago by BigDaddyJuno@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space

161 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Basically the title. Replace Murray with Trae. Contracts stay the same. Are the Nuggets better or worse now? I’m talking about Trae Young of the Atlanta Hawks by the way

(page 4) 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] carnaIity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Jamal + Dejounte would shut down the league. Hawks play better without Traevon.

[–] Own_Avocado8448@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I think Young is the netter player, but I think Murray is a much better fit next to Jokic. Trae is more on Ball than Murray and is not as good a play maker as Joker. While I am a big Trae Young Supporter, I dont know if he is an unpgrade from 3 either.

[–] MississippiBudMANE@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Worse, Trae would take a lot of the game away from Joker, who Murray compliments the hell out of

[–] Chonker43@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Um…. Better duh.

[–] MoooonRiverrrr@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Wait, which Trae Young?

load more comments