this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
1055 points (97.5% liked)

Greentext

5223 readers
1825 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 5 points 13 hours ago

I live in rural Norway up in the mountain side. We have wind, snow, ice and rain like hell, and I have ~150 elevation to get to the main road to get anywhere.

... I'm still considering getting a bike for all the mentioned benefits.

[–] missandry351@lemmings.world -3 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Because people with disabilities and chronic illness exist, and because depending on the distance it’s not possible to go by bike and depending on the terrain it’s also no possible. Oh and the weather I forgot the weather… oh and in some roads, like highways, for example, these can’t even drive there:..

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 12 hours ago

Because there's no Microcenter in my city.

[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

$20 gas gets me much, much, much further than $20 in eating high carb prepared food when riding my bike between point A and B. Not fuel efficient, in fact, energy expensive, but it is over all cheaper than a car if you can handle the potential physical abuse of riding a quarter mile up hill to your house. I did this last year while my car was in the shop, I learned I lived at the top of a hill, in the middle of a valley. Lost around 14lbs in a week just running errands, and I was carb loading like crazy. Carbs, meat, sugars, and tons of water. Riding a bike is all laughs and giggles until you're doing it to get meat and milk to fuel your required errands and despite eating everything in sight you're still losing weight at a shocking pace... They had my car a month, I was able to hold out on most errands until around just before the final week, went from 179, to 165. Kept eating as I felt I needed and was back up to 175 in about a week after getting my car back, and with recent exercise and pushing myself I dropped to 169 while increasing my max weight, it's really only surprising when you find I was 280ish lbs just 6 yrs ago... I digress, bikes are tough on the body.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Because it's harder to kill someone by hitting them with it.

But in all seriousness, you can go a lot farther, a lot faster, across much worse terrain and weather in a car than a bike.

[–] DoYouNot@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

How often does the average person really need to do that? Multimodal is where it's at! Drive when you need to, don't when there are alternatives. But alternatives need to exist for that to work, so vote for them.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 17 hours ago (46 children)

I dare you to travel on your own bicycle in the depths of winter across the USA in the same timeframe as a car.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 18 points 17 hours ago (10 children)

Eh, I did that for a couple years in Utah and it was largely fine. When the snow got nasty, I took the bus.

That was back when my commute was 10 miles (16km) with a segregated bike path the whole way. My new commute is more than double that, so I drive. But if we weren't so car centric, things would be more compact and I wouldn't have this nasty commute.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (6 children)

But demonstrate the incontrovertible need for a car during one's regular commute through an average modern city. And I'm even offering the main exception - busses and taxis/ride sharing/whatever the current nomenclature, as I consider public transportation to be its own independent thing, unrelated to Cars.

I think the people who would enjoy such a venture via bike have or are already doing it, the rest of us would just like to be able to ride the bike through the city without having to play Frogger with three lanes filled with enraged lumps of cortisol *wrapped in two tons of steel and various other such substances.

Edit: added * to further drive home the viscerality of my desire.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 13 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

The reason you can't is much more about infrastructure than weather, especially within cities

Source: I live in Scandinavia and everyone bikes even when it's cold

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MichaelScotch@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

That’s impossible and no one is implying that bikes should replace other modes of transport for interstate travel. However, I bike commute in winter in Wisconsin and it takes less time than riding the bus. Driving a car is faster than my bike commute, but only marginally so.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›