He'd be the 15th best player. I don't want to hear any bullshit counter-arguments about him being 14th, 16th, 13th or whatever. I know ball, and he'd be the 15th best player.
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
NBA - Main
14 readers
3 users here now
Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Drexler doesn't really have a perfect modern comp. He was a #1 option who couldn't dribble without looking at the ball.
He used strength, athleticism, timely cuts and slashes to score. He wouldn't be a #1 option in today's game but he'd still be a valuable player. He'd be a supercharged 3+D type wing.
Like a lot of super athletic players from his era, Drexler would greatly benefit from today's fast-paced, less physical form of play. When he got a full head of steam going towards the hoop about the only way to stop him was to hammer him.
At his peak, drexler was the best shooting guard in the league second only to MJ
So, not the best shooting guard in the league then?
I clarified he was second to MJ, so yeah that would make him not the best
Yeah should've just said 2nd best
u/jumboponcho raised the point I was going to. Clyde couldn't go left in isolation. I think his handle was underrated...but it's still not up to snuff for a star. He could handle in transition, but he didn't have much shake. As a result, his game was heavily based on pull up jumpers, spot up jumpers, with curls and isolations in the mid post that saw him be able to use his athleticism to attack the basket on the move without taking too many dribbles. Obviously also dynamic in transition and off cuts.
The increased space would surely would benefit Clyde but don't think he could be a star in this era. Not a good enough ballhandler, not a good enough perimeter shooter.